Startseite > Geo Politik > Der neue US Skandal in Afghanistan mit der Schändung von ermordeten Zivilisten

Der neue US Skandal in Afghanistan mit der Schändung von ermordeten Zivilisten

Januar 12, 2012

Von Skandal zu Skandal: Primitiver gehts nicht mehr und die Ermordeten, waren klare Zivilisten.

Wenn Zivilisten ermorden, zum Zeit Vertreib, einer Killer NATO Truppe gehört.



The Kill Team: How U.S. Soldiers in Afghanistan Murdered Innocent Civilians | ARTICLE

Early last year after six hard months soldiering in Afghanistan a group of American infantrymen reached a momentous decision It was finally time to kill a haji Among the men of Bravo Company the notion of killing an Afghan civilian had been the subject of countless conversations during lunchtime…
Read more:


US-Soldaten sollen tote Taliban geschändet haben


US-Soldaten in Afghanistan: Verdacht auf Leichenschändung (die Echtheit der Aufnahme kann von SPIEGEL ONLINE nicht verifiziert werden)Zur Großansicht



US-Soldaten in Afghanistan: Verdacht auf Leichenschändung (die Echtheit der Aufnahme kann von SPIEGEL ONLINE nicht verifiziert werden)

Es sind verstörende Bilder, die im Internet kursieren: Auf einem Web-Clip sind US-Soldaten zu sehen, die offenbar auf die Leichen getöteter Taliban-Kämpfer in Afghanistan urinieren. Das Pentagon nennt den Vorfall „ungeheuerlich“, ein Vertreter der Taliban spricht dagegen von einer „kleineren Angelegenheit“…,1518,808632,00.html

US Marine Corps probes ‚Taliban desecration‘ video


Part of channel(s): Afghanistan (current event)


The US military has said it is investigating a video that appears to show a group of Marines urinating on dead Taliban fighters.

The Marine Corps said the actions portrayed in the clip, which was posted online but has not yet been verified, were not consistent with its values.

The footage shows four men in military fatigues appearing to urinate on three apparently lifeless men.

A man’s voice is heard saying: „Have a great day, buddy.“

The men lying on the ground have brown skin, bare feet and are dressed in loose-fitting outfits. One appears to be covered in blood.

The origin of the video is not known, nor is it clear who posted it online.

The men in military fatigues seem aware that they are being filmed.

Pentagon spokesman Capt John Kirby said in a statement: „We are deeply troubled by the video.

„Whoever it is, and whatever the circumstances – which we know is under investigation – it is egregious behaviour and unacceptable for a member of the military.“

Marine Corps headquarters at the Pentagon said in a statement: „The actions portrayed are not consistent with our core values and are not indicative of the character of the Marines in our Corps. This matter will be fully investigated.“

A spokesman for the Taliban in Afghanistan told the BBC his group „strongly condemns this action and it is not a human action. It’s a wild action that is too shameful for us to talk about“.

Afghan Member of Parliament Fawzia Kofi said ordinary Afghans, no matter how they felt about the Taliban, would be upset by the video.

„It’s a matter of a human being, respect to a human being,“ she told the BBC.

„I believe that the brutal acts that the Taliban did here during their government and even now is condemned by Afghans. So is watching a brutal act by international forces. We condemn that as well,“ she added.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (Cair) said the video, if verified, showed behaviour that was totally unbecoming of US military personnel.

„It’s a disgusting, immoral video. Something that no military would be proud of and I think the least of which would be the American military,“ the council’s spokesman Ibrahim Hooper told the BBC.

„It’s unbecoming for any military personnel anywhere in the world, and in fact could be in violation of international laws of war, besides being in violation of the American uniform code of military justice.“—-

More on the BBC’s website:

  • The Stoner Arms Dealers


    How two American kids became big-time weapons traders

  • Read more:




    Make A Drug Deal with Afghanistan? | BLOG ENTRY

    This Los Angeles Times op-ed about dealing with the degeneration of Afghanistan into a terror/narco state presents one of the most interesting arguments I’ve read all year The solution is simple Instead of destroying Afghanistan’s most valuable resource Western governments should buy it outright and resell it to producers of…

    November 8, 2006 8:46 PM ET

    Read more:




    Heroinland; Or How Afghanistan Became a Narco-state | BLOG ENTRY

    Remember last year how Afghanistan set a world record for opium production and supplied the world with 90 percent of it’s heroin? Well let’s just say its been another bumper crop this year Despite millions dedicated to fight the devil drug Afghan Opium production is up 40 percent

    August 16, 2006 7:27 PM ET

    Read more:


    Read more:



    Pentagon murder bande: Blackwater in Iraq


    Top Militär costs

    miltär kosten

    Kategorien:Geo Politik Schlagwörter: , , ,
    1. Oktober 19, 2018 um 4:32 am

      Fotos von Afghanistan 1967-68 (Dr. Bill Podlich)

      Nicht vergessen dies hier war Afghanistan.

      Man beachte Mädchen in der Schule, bekleidet mit Miniröcken.
      Und dies ohne dass die Bundes“wehr“ „Brunnen bohrte“.

      Dann kam dies hier:

      Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski

      Question: The former director of the C_A, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs [„From the Shadows“], that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this period you were the national security adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?

      Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, C_A aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.

      Q: Despite this risk, you were an advocat

    1. No trackbacks yet.
    Kommentare sind geschlossen.
    %d Bloggern gefällt das: