Archiv

Archive for Januar 2013

Hacker gegen US-Ministerium: Rache für den Tod von Aaron Swartz

Januar 28, 2013 3 Kommentare

Screenshot aus dem YouTube-Video von Anonymous. Screenshot aus dem YouTube-Video von Anonymous.(Foto: Screenshot n-tv.de)
Sonntag, 27. Januar 2013

Rache für den Tod von Aaron SwartzAnonymous hackt US-Ministerium
Mit dem Hack der Webseite einer mit dem US-Justizministerium verbundenen Behörde reagiert die Hackergruppe Anonymous auf den Tod des Internetaktivisten Aaron Swartz. Zudem droht sie dem Ministerium mit der Veröffentlichung brisanter Dokumente.

Aus Rache für den Tod des 26-jährigen Internetaktivisten Aaron Swartz hat die Hackergruppe Anonymous dem US-Justizministerium mit der Veröffentlichung vertraulicher Dokumente gedroht. Die Gruppe teilte mit, in die Internetseite der zum Ministerium gehörenden Sentencing Commission eingedrungen zu sein. Die Seite der unabhängigen Behörde, die Grundsätze für Strafbemessungen ausarbeitet, war am Samstag offenbar blockiert. Anonymous warf dem Ministerium vor, im Fall des jungen Internetaktivisten übertrieben hart vorgegangen zu sein.

Der als Internet-Genie gefeierte Mitbegründer der Social-News-Webseite Reddit und des Onlinedienstes RSS hatte sich kurz vor dem Beginn eines Strafprozesses wegen Datendiebstahls das Leben genommen. Swartz, der sich für den freien Zugang zu Inhalten im Internet einsetzte, wurde vorgeworfen, Millionen literarischer und wissenschaftlicher Artikel von einer kommerziellen Datenbank gestohlen zu haben. Er hatte die Daten mit Hilfe eines im Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) versteckten Computers heruntergeladen. Ihm drohten bei einer Verurteilung bis zu 35 Jahre Haft sowie eine Geldbuße von 753.000 Euro.

In einem Video auf dem Internetportal YouTube kritisierte Anonymous scharf die „unverhältnismäßige strafrechtliche Verfolgung“ von Hackern. Die Gruppe erklärte, auch in weitere Netze der Regierung eingedrungen zu sein und vertrauliche Dokumente kopiert zu haben. Sie habe zudem „spaltbares Material für mehrere Atomsprengköpfe“ für einen Angriff auf das Justizministerium und andere Regierungsbehörden gesammelt, die in die „Rechte und Freiheiten des Einzelnen“ eingriffen. Das FBI leitete nach eigenen Angaben Ermittlungen ein.

http://www.n-tv.de/technik/Anonymous-hackt-US-Ministerium-article10019501.html

2013-0066.htm         Aaron Swartz Memorial Hackathons                 January 23, 2013

Swartz-Series         Alleged Downloads by Aaron Swartz Series         January 23, 2013

Swartz-00061.pdf      Aaron Swartz: Charles Babbage Perfection Engines January 23, 2013 (799KB)
Swartz-00060.pdf      Aaron Swartz: Ethics of Killing                  January 23, 2013 (1.9MB)
Swartz-00059.pdf      Aaron Swartz: Human Liberty - Freedom of Speech  January 23, 2013 (30.5MB)
Swartz-00058.pdf      Aaron Swartz: Vital Democracy in Action          January 23, 2013 (953KB)
Swartz-00057.pdf      Aaron Swartz: Future People                      January 23, 2013 (1.5MB)

Swartz-00056.pdf      Aaron Swartz: Justice Beyond Borders             January 23, 2013 (1.3MB)
Swartz-00055.pdf      Aaron Swartz: Overcriminalization                January 23, 2013 (1.6MB)
Swartz-00054.pdf      Aaron Swartz: Uninhibited Robust Wide-Open Press January 23, 2013 (987KB)
Swartz-00053.pdf      Aaron Swartz: Technology: A World History        January 23, 2013 (3.7MB)
Swartz-00052.pdf      Aaron Swartz: Concealment and Exposure           
Advertisements
Kategorien:Spezial Schlagwörter:

Die aktuellen Morde an Kinder in Afghanistan, Jemen, Pakistan durch die NATO Terroristen

Januar 28, 2013 12 Kommentare

Hey, Hey, Barack! What Do You Say? How Many Kids Have You Killed Today?

Dave Lindorff

27obama-plus-victim.jpg

January 27, 2013

I personally found the president’s inaugural speech not just insipid, but disgusting. It reached its gut-churning nadir near the end where he said:

„We, the people, still believe that enduring security and lasting peace do not require perpetual war…We will show the courage to try and resolve our differences with other nations peacefully – not because we are naïve about the dangers we face, but because engagement can more durably lift suspicion and fear…And we must be a source of hope to the poor, the sick, the marginalized, the victims of prejudice – not out of mere charity, but because peace in our time requires the constant advance of those principles that our common creed describes:  tolerance and opportunity; human dignity and justice.“
As he spoke these uplifting phrases, US factories were cranking out, under the terms of billion-dollar Pentagon contracts, fleets of drone aircraft that daily are raining explosives down on innocent men, women and children in countries that the US is not even at war with. Most of those drone attacks are personally approved by our Nobel Peace Laureate president, who has claimed the right — unchallenged by either Congress or the Judiciary — to order the liquidation of anyone he deems to be a terrorist (including American citizens), as well as those, even children, who happen to be in the vicinity of such a person. Of the 362 drone strikes in Pakistan to date, 310 were launched during the period Obama has been commander in chief.

The result of this policy of state terrorism has been a wretched, criminal slaughter of children — a slaughter that has been hidden from view, and denied wholesale by the Pentagon and the president. Over 3000 people have been killed, the vast majority of them non-combatant „collateral damage“ deaths. Over 172 of these have reportedly been children.

Noor Syed, 8-year-old girl, one of Obama's first drone victims, killed in Pakistan drone attack on Feb. 14, 2009.Noor Syed, 8-year-old Pakistani girl and one of Obama’s first drone victims, murdered in a US drone attack in South Waziristan, Pakistan on Feb. 14, 2009.

To borrow from the president’s own style-book, „We the People“ have been complicit in ignoring this wretched slaughter. „We the People,“ who cringe in horror at the slaying of 20 innocent first graders in Newtown, Connecticut, don’t spare a thought or a tear for the thousands of innocent children killed in our name by our „heroic“ forces in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Libya, and elsewhere, by our Presidentially-targeted drone aircraft in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia, and by our weapons in the hands of allies and rebel fighters in places like Syria, Gaza, the West Bank of Palestine, Somalia, and elsewhere.

Just to try and make this monstrous crime by this president clear, here is a partial list, compiled by the organization DronesWatch, of children, some as young as 1 and 2 years old, who have been documented as killed by US drones (they are listed by name, age and sex in that order):
PAKISTAN



Noor Aziz | 8 | male
Abdul Wasit | 17 | male
Noor Syed | 8 | female
Wajid Noor | 9 | male
Syed Wali Shah | 7 | male
Ayeesha | 3 | female
Qari Alamzeb | 14| male
Shoaib | 8 | male
Hayatullah KhaMohammad | 16 | male
Tariq Aziz | 16 | male
Sanaullah Jan | 17 | male
Maezol Khan | 8 | female
Nasir Khan | male
Naeem Khan | male
Naeemullah | male
Mohammad Tahir | 16 | male
Azizul Wahab | 15 | male
Fazal Wahab | 16 | male
Ziauddin | 16 | male
Mohammad Yunus | 16 | male
Fazal Hakim | 19 | male
Ilyas | 13 | male
Sohail | 7 | male
Asadullah | 9 | male
khalilullah | 9 | male
Noor Mohammad | 8 | male
Khalid | 12 | male
Saifullah | 9 | male
Mashooq Jan | 15 | male
Nawab | 17 | male
Sultanat Khan | 16 | male
Ziaur Rahman | 13 | male
Noor Mohammad | 15 | male
Mohammad Yaas Khan | 16 | male
Qari Alamzeb | 14 | male
Ziaur Rahman | 17 | male
Abdullah | 18 | male
Ikramullah Zada | 17 | male
Inayatur Rehman | 16 | male
Shahbuddin | 15 | male
Yahya Khan | 16 |male
Rahatullah |17 | male
Mohammad Salim | 11 | male
Shahjehan | 15 | male
Gul Sher Khan | 15 | male
Bakht Muneer | 14 | male
Numair | 14 | male
Mashooq Khan | 16 | male
Ihsanullah | 16 | male
Luqman | 12 | male
Jannatullah | 13 | male
Ismail | 12 | male
Taseel Khan | 18 | male
Zaheeruddin | 16 | male
Qari Ishaq | 19 | male
Jamshed Khan | 14 | male
Alam Nabi | 11 | male
Qari Abdul Karim | 19 | male
Rahmatullah | 14 | male
Abdus Samad | 17 | male
Siraj | 16 | male
Saeedullah | 17 | male
Abdul Waris | 16 | male
Darvesh | 13 | male
Ameer Said | 15 | male
Shaukat | 14 | male
Inayatur Rahman | 17 | male
Salman | 12 | male
Fazal Wahab | 18 | male
Baacha Rahman | 13 | male
Wali-ur-Rahman | 17 | male
Iftikhar | 17 | male
Inayatullah | 15 | male
Mashooq Khan | 16 | male
Ihsanullah | 16 | male
Luqman | 12 | male
Jannatullah | 13 | male
Ismail | 12 | male
Abdul Waris | 16 | male
Darvesh | 13 | male
Ameer Said | 15 | male
Shaukat | 14 | male
Inayatur Rahman | 17 | male
Adnan | 16 | male
Najibullah | 13 | male
Naeemullah | 17 | male
Hizbullah | 10 | male
Kitab Gul | 12 | male
Wilayat Khan | 11 | male
Zabihullah | 16 | male
Shehzad Gul | 11 | male
Shabir | 15 | male
Qari Sharifullah | 17 | male
Shafiullah | 16 | male
Nimatullah | 14 | male
Shakirullah | 16 | male
Talha | 8 | male
YEMEN

Afrah Ali Mohammed Nasser | 9 | female
Zayda Ali Mohammed Nasser | 7 | female
Hoda Ali Mohammed Nasser | 5 | female
Sheikha Ali Mohammed Nasser | 4 | female
Ibrahim Abdullah Mokbel Salem Louqye | 13 | male
Asmaa Abdullah Mokbel Salem Louqye | 9 | male
Salma Abdullah Mokbel Salem Louqye | 4 | female
Fatima Abdullah Mokbel Salem Louqye | 3 | female
Khadije Ali Mokbel Louqye | 1 | female
Hanaa Ali Mokbel Louqye | 6 | female
Mohammed Ali Mokbel Salem Louqye | 4 | male
Jawass Mokbel Salem Louqye | 15 | female
Maryam Hussein Abdullah Awad | 2 | female
Shafiq Hussein Abdullah Awad | 1 | female
Sheikha Nasser Mahdi Ahmad Bouh | 3 | female
Maha Mohammed Saleh Mohammed | 12 | male
Soumaya Mohammed Saleh Mohammed | 9 | female
Shafika Mohammed Saleh Mohammed | 4 | female
Shafiq Mohammed Saleh Mohammed | 2 | male
Mabrook Mouqbal Al Qadari | 13 | male
Daolah Nasser 10 years | 10 | female
AbedalGhani Mohammed Mabkhout | 12 | male
Abdel- Rahman Anwar al Awlaki | 16 | male
Abdel-Rahman al-Awlaki | 17 | male
Nasser Salim | 19|male

Source


:: Article nr. 94729 sent on 28-jan-2013 19:33 ECT
www.uruknet.info?p=94729

Afghanistan: Prison Probe Should Address Longstanding Abuses
Inquiry Should Focus on Torture, Abuse of Women, Procedural Lapses

Human Rights Watch


September 27, 2013- …Afghan detention centers and prisons are rife with serious abuse, including torture, medically invalid „virginity examinations“ of women, and holding detainees past their release date. The problems are so pervasive that the committee will need to set priorities and focus on the key issues… A United Nations report released in January found that more than half of 635 pretrial detainees and prisoners convicted on national security grounds had been tortured or ill-treated in Afghan government custody. Detainees told the UN investigators that torture was typically used to try to elicit confessions. Fourteen forms of torture were reported, including suspension from ceilings, prolonged and severe beating, including on the soles of the feet, twisting genitals of male detainees, electric shock, prolonged standing or forced exercise, prolonged exposure to cold weather, and threats of execution and rape…

  continua / continued avanti - next    [101252] [ 28-sep-2013 23:57 ECT ]

Kategorien:Geo Politik Schlagwörter:

Echelon: CIA’s secret prison: ‘Poland dragging out investigation’

Januar 28, 2013 1 Kommentar

 

 

2014-1679.pdf         Echelon Affair: EP and Global Spying 1998-2002   December 6, 2014 (1.8MB)

Die Amerikaner haben viel zu verbergen auch in Poland, deshalb gibt es keine Ermittlungen.

CIA’s secret prison: ‘Poland dragging out investigation’

RussiaToday

January 27, 2013

A Polish investigation into secret CIA jails is being suppressed because it will embarrass the top echelon of the country’s government, lawyers of two men held illegally in one of the CIA’s ‚black sites’ in Poland tell media.

Reportedly, the results of this investigation could link some of Poland’s most senior politicians with illegal detention and torture, as well as impact negatively on the relationship between Poland and its key ally, the US, according to Reuters.

The news agency’s sources, including lawyers and human rights activists, reveal that the investigation was halted after the original investigators were taken off the case early last year.

The probe began in 2008 with prosecutors from the capital Warsaw, but in early 2012 the prosecutor-general transferred the investigation to the southern city of Krakow.

„The image is of a complete lack of action,“ Mikolaj Pietrzak, lawyer for Saudi national Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri who says he was detained in a CIA jail on Polish soil, told Reuters. „The case is obviously, in my opinion, under political control … The most convenient thing politically is for the case to drag on,“ Pietrzak added.

Bartlomiej Jankowski, a lawyer for the second alleged ex-detainee, Abu Zubaydah, has confirmed this.

„I am not receiving any information [from prosecutors] about new documents, nor am I informed about any new hearings. This is something that worries me,“ Jankowski said.

CIA-run prison was discovered in a small remote village Stare Kiejkuty and was operational from December 2002 to the fall of 2003. It was used to transport suspected Al-Qaeda members outside the US territory to interrogate without having to adhere to US law.

Polish officials say the investigators are still in the midst of collecting evidence and the investigation is taking so long because US officials have not been responding to information requests.

In 2006, then-President George W. Bush revealed the US had CIA detention facilities overseas, but no details came out as to their exact locations.However, human rights groups named Afghanistan, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Thailand as the most likely hosts.

The CIA’s black sites in Europe are rumored to have detained and tortured suspected terrorists, and to hold them in custody before being transported to the prison at Guantanamo Bay. The sites and the prisoners existed in legal limbo, with no oversight from citizens of the host countries. The CIA is believed to have operated with the knowledge and cooperation of the governments of those countries.

Poland is the second country to have opened a criminal investigation into the matter, after Lithuania (though that case has been closed).

Polish investigation is entering its fifth year, scheduled to end this month, but there are reports that the prosecutors may apply for an extension.

‚Investigation implicated senior levels of Polish government’

One of the main problems with the investigation is the fact that it affects top levels of Polish government, argues Polish Senator Jozef Pinior, who has pushed for a full investigation.

“ [The government] are in a sandwich between opening this issue up and the pressure from the hard core of the Polish state, the secret service, the prosecutor’s office, who say: ‚Let’s keep this secret‘,“ Pinior told Reuters.

In response, Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s office stated that the investigators are independent from external influence. „No executive body can influence the prosecutor’s actions,“ it said in a statement.

Rumors about Poland hosting a CIA-run prison had circulated for years, though the country’s authorities dismissed them as absurd.However, the UN and the Council of Europe had long claimed they had evidence of the site’s existence.

Also aware of the CIA program was Marek Dukaczewski, who was head of military intelligence when the alleged jail was in operation. He was the only one to acknowledge the CIA prison publicly in 2010.

Two prisoners from Guantanamo Bay, Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri and Abu Zubaydah, claimed they were prisoners at this black site. Polish prosecutors have already given the two ‚victim status’.

Among other possible detainees are self-proclaimed 9/11 terrorist mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, perpetrator of the 2000 USS Cole bombing Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, and Palestinian terror suspect Abu Zubaydah.

Source


:: Article nr. 94730 sent on 28-jan-2013 19:52 ECT
www.uruknet.info?p=94730

2014-1694.pdf         Senate CIA Torture Report Feinstein Statement    December 9, 2014
2014-1693.htm offsite CIA Response to Torture Report 1 2 3             December 9, 2014
2014-1692.pdf         Senate CIA Torture Report State Talk Points      December 9, 2014
2014-1691.pdf         Senate CIA Torture Report Obama Statement        December 9, 2014
2014-1690.pdf         Senate CIA Torture Report Minority Views         December 9, 2014 (14.5MB)

2014-1689.pdf         Senate CIA Torture Report Additional Views       December 9, 2014 (2.0MB)
2014-1688.txt         Hacked RU Interior Ministry URLs and File List   December 9, 2014
2014-1687.pdf         Senate CIA Torture Report                        December 9, 2014 (108MB)
Kategorien:Ex-Kommunistische Länder Schlagwörter: , ,

ISSA’s Libya Policy Group (LPG) has hundreds of reports on the Libyan political and security issues, and WMD research programs

Januar 19, 2013 2 Kommentare

  Help

Special Reports

 

ISSA’s Libya Policy Group (LPG) has hundreds of reports on the Libyan political and security issues, and WMD research programs, prepared over the past decade. A selection of these will appear on this site. Please check regularly for the addition of important archival reports and new studie

March 25, 2011: Obama Approach to Libya Polarizes NATO, and Further Pushes Turkey into the anti-US Camp/Albania Government Selling Weapons to Qadhafi/Libya’s Tribal Complexity Drives the 2011 Civil War

March 21, 2011: Wider Strategic Factors Emerge as UN-backed “No-Fly Zone” Begins to Take Effect in Libya

February 25, 2011: The Mediterranean, Africa, and the Middle East, Post-Qadhafi: Awakening to a Diverse Landscape, Unimagined in the West

February 23, 2011: Musings of an Heretic: Where the Middle East is Going, and Why the West Fails to Grasp the Many Realities

February 3, 2011: Libya’s Qadhafi Moves Toward Transition, Avoiding Succession Problems, and Resisting Radical Islamists

January 30, 2004: Iraqi WMD Debate and Intelligence Failed to View Total Picture: the Libya Links
January 30, 2004:
Qadhafi’s Health Deteriorates as Opposition Mounts
January 26, 2004:
New Evidence of Ongoing Qadhafi Involvement in Terrorism, Support for Sudanese Rebels
January 22, 2004:
Qadhafi “Rear Guard” Action Attempts to Halt US Discovery of WMD Link With Iraq
December 23, 2003:
Evidence of Libyan Involvement in Mauritania Coup Attempt Highlights Qadhafi’s Strategic Direction
December 22, 2003:
Libyan WMD Programs, Long Cited by GIS, Admitted as Qadhafi Begins Rear-Guard Action to Stave Off US Attack
December 17, 2003:
Libya’s Saif al-Islam Moves Further Away From Reconciliation With US, EU
December 10, 2003:
Qadhafi Seen as Listless at Tunis Summit
December 4, 2003:
New Evidence Illustrates Libyan Leadership Preparing for Qadhafi’s Death
September 5, 2003:
Qadhafi Denies Responsibility for Lockerbie; Calls US Leaders “Prostitutes” and Privately Alleges He Has Bribed Key US Officials to Achieve Closure on Case
September 4, 2003:
Libya, Iran, DPRK Discuss New Strategic Missile Procurement
July 29, 2003:
Niger-Iraq Uranium Reports Involve Ongoing Libyan Deception Ops 
March 12, 2003: Libya Grasps at “Normalization” of Relations With US, UK as Saudi Arabia Reverses Relations With Tripoli
March 3, 2003:
Outburst by Crown Prince ‘Abdullah Acknowledges Possible Saudi Role in Libyan 1969 Coup and Highlights Qadhafi’s Illness

February 27, 2003: US Bush Administration Looking Beyond Iraq to Promote Change in Iran, Libya and Syria
December 11, 2002:
Fresh Coup Attempt Against Qadhafi Involves Family; Highlights Confusion
October 1, 2002:
Weapons Grade Uranium Moving in Middle East; Iraqi WMD and Delivery Development Being Undertaken in Libya
August 14, 2002: UK Promises Qadhafi Support in Exchange for IRA Data
August 7, 2002:
UK Begins Direct Negotiations With Libya “On Flawed Premise”
July 30, 2002:
Time to End the Hypocrisy Over Qadhafi
July 29, 2002: Qadhafi Claims That US Attempting to Replace Him With the Sanusi Monarchy

July 12, 2002:
Qadhafi Orders Killing of Occupants of Entire Libyan Army Base, Then Tells CNN He Opposes Terrorism
May 17, 2002:
New Round of Libya-US-UK Talks Getting Underway, But No Settlement Anticipated
May 9, 2002:
Saif al-Islam, in Bid to Move Into Libyan Decisionmaking, Focuses on Libyan al-Qaida Prisoners at Guantanamo Bay
May 8, 2002:
US Now Focuses Attention on Libya as Hostile State, While Libya Moves Rapidly to Bolster Strategic Ties With Iran
April 29, 2002:
Mubarak Flies to Libya to Seek Funds from Qadhafi
March 27, 2002:
Libya’s Saif al-Islam Admits Prospect of Assuming Leadership; Qadhafi Refuses to Participate in Arab League Summit
March 15, 2002: Libya Expected to Resume More Overtly Radical Approach With Rejection of al-Megrahi Appeal on PA103
March 11, 2002: Libya Continues to Escalate Anti-US, Anti-Israeli Stance Following Breakdown of Talks
March 5, 2002:
US Pressure Expected on Egyptian Pres. Mubarak Over Libya, WMD

February 19, 2002:
Libya’s Succession Preparations Continue as Saif al-Islam al-Qadhafi Adds al-Qaida and Radicals to His Militia
February 15, 2002:
Libya Wins State Department Approval to Deal With US Oil Leases, and Then Takes in al-Qaida Captives
February 4, 2002:
Major Changes Continue to Move Libya Into the Forefront of Strategic Focus
February 1, 2002:
The Sanusi and Wahhabi Movements of Islam: Born of the Same Man and Products of Their Culture
January 24, 2002:
False Reports of an Impending Libyan Deal to Compensate PA103 Victims Designed to Cool US Pressures on Qadhafi
January 16, 2002:
Qadhafi’s Problems Persist, Fueling Belief That Compromise Solutions for the Future May be Possible
January 8, 2002:
Reports of New Coup Attempt Against Qadhafi;  Militia of Qadhafi’s Renegade Son Disbanded
January 7, 2002:
Libya at a Watershed as Qadhafi Attempts to Re-Define His Leadership
December 10, 2001:
Qadhafi’s Health at Issue as Libyan Future Debated
November 8, 2001:
Qadhafi Seizes Opportunity to Move Out of Isolation While Expanding Radical Activities, Including CBW Development
January 12, 2001:
Collapse of Lockerbie PA103 Case Changes Strategic Disposition of Libya
November 8, 2000:
Libyan NoDong SSMs Reported Targeting Southern NATO Sites and Israel
May 1, 2000:
An Unstable Qadhafi Seen Ready to Use Window to Pursue Strategic Agenda
September 8, 1999:
Libyan Leader, 30 Years Into His Rule, is Given New Lease of Life


March 25, 2011

Obama Approach to Libya Polarizes NATO, and Further Pushes Turkey into the anti-US Camp

Analysis. By Gregory R. Copley, Editor, GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs. The US Obama Administration’s lack of leadership in helping to resolve the Libyan civil war has, among other things, widened the rift between the US and European members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), and has made the US increasingly less influential in global strategic issues.

The confused and reluctant approach of the Obama White House has also clearly exacerbated the rift — which official Washington chooses not to see — between Turkey and the US, and has hastened the move of Turkey into a strategic camp which is hostile to the US.

See: Defense & Foreign Affairs Special Analysis, March 6, 2009: Turkey Makes its Strategic Choice: Russia.

US Pres. Barack Obama specifically set back international efforts to restrain Libyan leader Mu’ammar al-Qadhafi when he telegraphed to Qadhafi the fact that the US would not sustain a protracted military campaign against him; that the air and missile operations of Operation Odyssey Dawn would be of limited duration; and that the US would under no account use ground forces against Qadhafi.

The Obama approach — despite the clear, professional, and comprehensive accomplishment by the US Armed Forces of those tasks assigned to them for the brief engagement — reflected Pres. Obama’s belief that he must be clear of foreign military operations to successfully win a second term in the White House. However, it also reflected the very real knowledge that he and many of his friends and associates have been compromised by funds which had been made available to them by Mu’ammar al-Qadhafi in recent years. This is now an open secret in Washington policy circles.

The US lack of leadership on the Libya question — after Pres. Obama had recently so notably encouraged protestors against the governments of Tunisia and Egypt, and the Government of Bahrain in the face of Iranian-backed protestors — coupled with the military intervention by a number of external governments in the Libyan civil war during March 2011 (as a result of the March 17, 2011, United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 of 2011), has served to accelerate growing divisions between European powers: between some European states and the US; and within NATO.

One of the most significant developments has been the growing polarization between Western European states and Turkey, which has become increasingly aligned with Russia and Iran, and which has clearly aligned itself with outgoing Libyan leader Mu’ammar al-Qadhafi.

The emerging alignments on the Libyan question are marrying with other trends which have effectively now ended the fiction that Turkey can become a member of the European Union (EU). Indeed, there is increasingly a view in much of the EU that Turkey is positioning itself as the major problem for the Union and for NATO, but one which still has a significant “gatekeeper” role in affecting the oil and gas traffic from Central Asia and the Caucasus to Western Europe.

Turkey remains a critical transit region, too, for the airlift of non-combat support to US troops in Afghanistan, and is home to a number of US Air Force units and to US nuclear weapons. As a result, many US decisionmakers do not want to face the issue of what a Turkish “defection” from its six decades of alliance with the US would mean. US global strategic doctrine would have to be re-written to reflect the move of Turkey out of the Western camp. Indeed, even the Cold War and post-Cold War concept of “the Western camp” needs to be reconsidered.

It is ironic, then, that the Turkish leadership and US Pres. Obama fundamentally agree in their support for Qadhafi. Turkey has gained commercial success in Libya under Qadhafi, but there is no reason why it could not also prosper if Libya had its democratic and constitutional government restored. But the Turkish Prime Minister has — like so many Washington officials — prospered at the direct or indirect hand of Qadhafi.

See Defense & Foreign Affairs Special Analysis, March 21, 2011: Wider Strategic Factors Emerge as UN-backed “No-Fly Zone” Begins to Take Effect in Libya.

Meanwhile, the US withdrew on March 25, 2011, from its temporary operational leadership of the 12-country coalition — which includes Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Italy, Norway, Qatar, Spain, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates — and allowed NATO as an organization to assume coordination (on March 26, 2011) of the “no-fly zone”. The Turkish Government immediately contested this, and NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen suggested that NATO would resolve this internal NATO challenge over the weekend of March 26-27, 2011. The US military would continue to participate as a supporting member of the enforcement coalition over Libya.

The Obama Administration has portrayed its keenness to minimize US military involvement against Qadhafi as a result of pressures from the US Republican Party majority in the House of Representatives to stop the Administration from entering another conflict without clear objectives or endgame. In reality, Pres. Obama has resisted US military participation against Qadhafi in large part because of his long history of association with Qadhafi, who has financed many around Pres. Obama over the past years. Qadhafi, in a number of his broadcasts during February and March 2011, issued veiled warnings to Obama, saying that Obama would know where his duty lay.

But while US political influence has moved into a period of precipitous decline, including declining influence in Europe, Operation Odyssey Dawn has demonstrated — yet again — the reality that states cannot acquire true, world-class military capabilities merely by buying advanced weapons systems. The Libyan Armed Forces, never trusted by Qadhafi, were consistently denied training, true operational experience, and even the ability undertake live-fire exercises or training in exercises alongside advanced partner forces. This was demonstrated in the UK-Argentine war over the Falkland Islands in 1982.

In that conflict, the only force which operated well for Argentina was the Air Force, which had consistently exercised with the US Air Force. The Argentine, Army, Navy, and Marines had not had recent exposure to any equivalent or superior military force, and thus failed to compete adequately with British forces.

In Libya today, the forces still loyal to Qadhafi have only been able to perform at all against the Constitutional forces opposed to Qadhafi because of better access to weapons and communications, and — more importantly — because the Constitutionalist forces have equally had no training or experience. When Qadhafi’s forces came against first-rate military forces, they have failed to perform even at a basic level. The question facing the Constitutionalist forces in Libya, then, is whether they can now use the breathing spaces the international community has bought for them to build some viable command and control capability to confront Qadhafi’s forces.

This lesson cannot be ignored by other military leaders in Africa and the Middle East. The lesson is that advanced military capabilities cannot be acquired merely by buying advanced military systems.

If that is the case, then second- and third-tier military forces must consider what, indeed, they can do to ensure that they can provide the capabilities required to fulfill their missions. One of the first steps, clearly, is the appropriate selection of adversaries, which requires an emphasis on diplomacy, psychological strategy, and sound strategic intelligence. Another is to ensure that forces are developed to utilize local cultural attributes and then enhanced through adequate adoption of technologies which must become inherent to the logic of those forces.

Qadhafi did not ensure that his armed forces were geared to any goal other than to intimidate his own population. Significantly, as well, the anti-Qadhafi forces — those who have been suppressed since 1969 — failed to prepare for the eventuality which they knew must come: the collapse of Qadhafi’s Government, or his death or flight. The opposition forces talked incessantly for four decades, but failed to make any plans for what has occurred in 2011, and that failure is also showing now.


Albania Government Selling Weapons to Qadhafi

From GIS South-East Europe Station, Thessaloniki. In January 2010, MEICO, a company owned by the Ministry of Defense of Albania, engaged in a complex operation of exporting 150,000 82mm mortar shells to Libya. Two Serbian arms smugglers made this export possible. One of them was Slobodan Tesic, who violated the UN weapons embargo to provide weapons to Pres. Charles Taylor in Liberia; the other was Zoran Damianovic, who in July 2005 spent a short time in prison in Montenegro for attempted smuggling of a thousand M70 and M72 Zastava assault rifles. [The Zastava is a reverse-engineered AK-47 Kalashnikov assault rifle variant.]

The export order to Libya for the 150,000 82mm mortar rounds was made to a Montenegrin company, Yugoimport, a subsidiary of the Serbian weapons company Yugoimport SDPR according to the EUC (end user certificate) and the cargo manifest and the bill of lading of the vessel which transported them. The payment was made through Niksicka Banka of Montenegro, a bank with long ties to the weapons trade of the Ministry of Defense of Albania.

Significantly, Montenegro, a small country of 600,000 inhabitants, was shown as importing 150,000 82mm mortar shells at a time when its military, by 2009, had phased out the 82mm mortar from its military inventory.

According to the records of Harbor Master Office of Durres Port (the main port of Albania) and the Center for the Surveillance of Sea Space situated at Plepa, five miles away from Durres Port (the center there is run by the Albanian Navy), the vessel loaded with the containers full of mortar shells followed a south-south-west course in the Adriatic Sea. Montenegro, ostensibly the intended destination, lies on the Adriatic shore, north of Albania.

This riddle of a vessel with a northerly destination sailing south can be solved thanks to the Port Clearance document issued by the office of the Harbor Master of Libyan port of Ras Lanuf, proving that the vessel left Ras Lanuf port empty after unloading the cargo there. This Port Clearance of Ras Lanuf was handed over to the Albanian Port authorities after the vessel returned to Durres Port.

The Niksicka Banka paid for the purchase of the 150,000 mortar rounds with funds from a Libyan company, LAFIC (Libyan Arab Foreign Investment Company). On February 23, 2011, insurgents and defecting soldiers stormed the SA-5 (NATO designation; Russian designation is S-200) surface-to-air missile (SAM) air defense base near Tobruk. They filmed seized caches of weapons and ammunition there, verifying — in the process — the Albanian sale.


Libya’s Tribal Complexity Drives the 2011 Civil War

Analysis. By GIS Staff. Libya has some 140 major tribes, most broken into clans, and it was this complexity of tribes — which vary in culture and religious approach based on their geography and history — which drove the creation of the 1951 Constitution and cemented the national acceptance of the Senussiyyah movement as the natural leadership group for Libya.

The Senussi family, the doyen of which — Seyyid Mohamed ibn Ali al-Senussi, known as al-Senussi al-Kabir — formed the Senussi sect of Islam in the late 18th Century, and this exceptionally moderate sect of Islam was adopted across much of Libya and other communities in North and West Africa and the Middle East. As a result, the Senussi family was able to be accepted in a leadership capacity in Libya, given that it did not represent a single Libyan tribe.

See Defense & Foreign Affairs Special Analysis, February 1, 2002: The Sanusi and Wahhabi Movements of Islam, Born of the Same Man and Products of Their Culture.

The present Libyan crisis represents the inevitable resurrection of the concept that none of the Libyan tribes wishes to be dominated by another. The September 1969 coup by Mu’ammar al-Qadhafi — it was a junior officer coup, not a revolution — eventually meant that the Qadhadhfa tribe placed itself over the others. The sudden appearance in February 2011 throughout Libya of the flag of the 1951 Senussi Constitution indicated the pent-up frustration over the four decades of Qadhadhfa domination.

It also showed how corrupt the Qadhafi Administration had become compared with the elected leadership of King Idris I, and the democratic parliamentary system he instituted, before Lt. Qadhafi seized power while the King was abroad for medical treatment in 1969.

Transliteration of tribal names varies according to the translator, but the predominant Libyan tribes and ethnic groups include:

http://128.121.186.47/ISSA/reports/Libya/index.htm

Kategorien:Geo Politik Schlagwörter: , , ,

Die Massenmorde der „Bilderberger“ Faschisten und Profi Betrüger der Finanzwelt

Januar 15, 2013 1 Kommentar

Blaupause für die Zukunft

Der elitäre Machtzirkel Trilaterale Kommission wurde im Juli 1973 auf Betreiben David Rockefellers ins Leben gerufen. Weitere Gründungsväter dieser privaten politikberatenden „Discussion Group“ sind Henry Kissinger und der als graue Eminenz unter den US-amerikanischen Globalstrategen bekannte Zbigniew Brzezinski. Als Zögling David Rockefellers wurde Brzezinski der erste Direktor dieser Gruppe prominenter politischer, akademischer und wirtschaftlicher Führungspersönlichkeiten aus den USA, aus Westeuropa und Japan. Die Bilderberger wie auch die Trilaterale Kommission sind unter dem über hundert Jahre bestehenden Dach The Round Table in ein Netz globaler Macht- und Denkzirkel eingebunden, zu denen auch die Vereinten Nationen, der Club of Rome sowie der Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) gehören (vgl. auch Abb. unten).

The Round Table: Wie alles begann (Quelle W. Effenberger, bibliotecapleyades.net)

Die Anfänge dieser Zirkel reichen bis in das 19. Jahrhundert zurück. Am Nachmittag des 5. Februar 1891 entwarfen drei einflussreiche Männer einen Organisationsplan für die zu gründende „Geheimgesellschaft“, die das Ziel verfolgen sollte, eine „Neue Weltordnung“ zu errichten. Was auf den ersten Blick in der Tat wie eine Verschwörungstheorie anmuten mag, ist heute gut belegt. Der Dreiergruppe, angeführt von Cecil Rhodes (1853–1902), Gründer des heute weltweit größten Diamantenproduzenten „De Beers“ sowie erfolgreicher Kolonialpolitiker in Südafrika, gehörten zudem an: William T. Stead (1849– 1912), berühmter Sensationsjournalist, sowie Reginald Baliol Brett (1852–1930), Freund und Vertrauter von Königin Victoria, und nach ihrem Tod einflussreicher Berater von König Edward VII. und König George V. Mit Arthur Milner (1854–1925), Gouverneur der Kapkolonie und von 1916 bis 1918 Mitglied in David Lloyd Georges Kriegskabinett, wurde ein Exekutivkomitee gegründet.

2007 gründete Joschka Fischer den europäischen Ableger des CFR, welcher stolz auf seinen Förderer, den Multimilliardär George Soros verweist. Daneben  unterhält der CFR außenpolitische Netzwerke wie die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik (DGAP), die Atlantik-Brücke, das Aspen-Institut in Berlin und seit Oktober 2007 eben auch den European Council on Foreign Relations.19 Nach Nixon mit seinem Sicherheitsberater Kissinger kamen alle folgenden US-Sicherheitsberater aus dem CFR.

Homepage zum Gründungszeitpunkt des European Council on Foreign Relations (EFCR), ganz im Sinne Zbigniew Brzezinkis, der die künftige Kampagne „EU vs. Russia“ vorgab (Quelle: Screenshot ECFR-Website vom Oktober 2007)

 

Neben diesen bekannten Gruppierungen bestehen weitere elitäre Zirkel, so etwa der European Roundtable of Industrialists. Dort versammeln sich halbjährlich die CEO‘s20 multinationaler Konzerne. Oder das World Economic Forum, das 1978 als Treffen der globalen Elite im Schweizer Örtchen Davos startete. Im gleichen Jahr wurde auch die die Group of Thirty ins Leben gerufen, ein Gremium führender  Privatbanker, das beinahe die Züge einer Loge trägt.

Die Group of Thirty, ein kaum beachteter, unterschätzter elitärer Zirkel (Quelle: Screenshot Website vom November 2012)

 

Die Finanzindustrie im Geheimen

An Bedeutsamkeit übertroffen werden diese Zirkel vermutlich nur von der 1985 gegründeten International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA). Unter diesem Dach haben sich die weltgrößten Banken und Spekulationshäuser zusammengeschlossen, angeführt von Stephen O’Connor, Direktor der Morgan Stanley Bank, und seinem Stellvertreter Michele Faissola, dem Mittelsmann der Deutschen Bank. Von hier aus erfolgten „gezielte Spekulationsattacken auf ganze Volkswirtschaften, unantastbare Finanzagenturen, die Regierungen in die Knie zwingen, und ohnmächtige Politiker.“21 Diese Sichtweise deckt sich mit der von Joseph Stieglitz, Professor an der Columbia University in New York und Nobelpreisträger für Ökonomie. Der Insider, er war jahrelang Chefökonom der neoliberal beeinflussten Weltbank, hat wiederholt darauf hingewiesen, dass dieses Gremium unmittelbar die Finanzpolitik der vermeintlich unabhängigen Zentralbanken der Welt bestimme. Gemeinsames Interesse der Akteure sei „die Spekulation mit Finanzderivaten aller Art, das ungehinderte Agieren an den Börsen.“22

Das Herz der „Finanzindustrie“: die International Swaps and Derivatives Association, kurz ISDA (Quelle: Screenshot Website vom November 2012)

 

Die Ergebnisse dieser Interessen sind bekannt, für manche spürbar und für viele sichtbar. Für Edzard Reuter, den ehemaligen Vorstandsvorsitzenden der Daimler-Benz AG (von 1987 bis 1995), hat die „Finanzindustrie“ inzwischen das Kommando über die Politik übernommen und bestimmt damit über unser Schicksal. Für Reuter ist das Terror, „weil Terror in dem Sinne heißt, dass er die Menschen zu Dingen zwingt, die sie eigentlich von sich aus gar nicht wollten.“23 Der Berliner Volkswirt Thorsten Lampe sieht in den Aktivitäten der Finanzindustrie sogar einen ökonomischen Putsch, der eine Umkehrung der demokratischen Machtverhältnisse bewirke. Die „Putschisten“ aus Wirtschaft und Finanzwelt benötigten keine Militärs, ihnen reiche die Börse, „um ihre Politik durchzusetzen, oder unliebsame beziehungsweise ausgediente Politiker auszutauschen, wie Papandreou, Zapatero oder Berlusconi. Mit abgesprochenen, gezielten Spekulationsattacken auf ganze Volkswirtschaften und auf Währungen wie den Euro bringen sie heute Regierungen zu Fall und hebeln die Demokratien aus.“24

Mit der Freigabe der geheimen Unterlagen am 26. Juni 2007 durch das amerikanische Nationalarchiv konnte die Steuerung der Medien durch die CIA nachweislich belegt werden

Es sind also nicht nur Einzelpersonen wie etwa der Megaspekulant Soros, deren Aktivitäten im Auge behalten werden sollten. „Das System ist kriminell. Das System ist in sich verbrecherisch, weil wertezerstörend und nicht, was die Volkswirtschaft eigentlich soll, werteschaffend“, meint der Jurist Bernd Schünemann.25 Diese wichtigen Zusammenhänge wurden vom Autor Roman Herzog in einem Dossier zusammengefasst unter dem Titel „Der ökonomische Putsch“ von SWR, SR und DLF am 20. April 2012 und vom BR2 am 9. und 11. November 2012 gesendet. Eine derartig gut recherchierte und informative Radiosendung wie die von Herzog ist in der heutigen Medienwelt leider absolute Ausnahme. Meistens wird dem Bestreben, über diese Zirkel und vor allem über die Bilderberger-Konferenzen zu schweigen oder sie zumindest als absolut harmlos darzustellen, mit vorauseilendem Gehorsam nachgekommen.

Medien und Machtzirkel

So bedankte sich David Rockefeller auf dem Bilderberger-Treffen Anfang Juni 1991 in Baden-Baden bei der Washington Post, der New York Times, dem Time Magazine und anderen Leitmedien, „deren Direktoren unseren Sitzungen beigewohnt und ihre Versprechungen zur Diskretion seit fast vierzig Jahren respektiert haben. Es wäre für uns unmöglich gewesen, unseren Plan für die Welt zu entwickeln, wenn wir während jener Jahre im Lichte der Öffentlichkeit gestanden hätten. Aber die Welt hat sich weiterentwickelt und ist bereit, in Richtung Weltregierung zu marschieren. Die überstaatliche Souveränität einer intellektuellen Elite und der Weltbankiers ist sicher der in den letzten Jahrhunderten praktizierten nationalen Selbstbestimmung vorzuziehen.“26

Ein typisches Beispiel aus der Medienlandschaft, das zur Veranschaulichung der Vorgehensweise dienen soll: Mit der äußerst originellen Überschrift „Die Ohnmacht der Bilderberg-Mächtigen“ versuchte Kommentator Markus Diem Meier in der Basler Zeitung vom 7. Juni 2011 die Bedeutung der Bilderberg-Treffen herunterzuspielen. Hätten die Bilderberg-Lenker dann nicht schon längst diese Treffen eingestellt? Unter „Was uns wirklich droht“ offenbart Meier: „Vor allem für die Verschwörungstheoretiker ist die Konferenz ein gefundenes Fressen.“ 

Spöttischer Artikel in der Basler Zeitung über Verschwörungstheorien im Zusammenhang mit den Bilderbergern (im Bild: Hotel de Bilderberg in Oosterbeek/Niederlande, wo das allererste Treffen stattfand)

 

Durch Artikel wie diesen werden all diejenigen, die in den verschwiegenen globalen Machtzirkeln eine Gefahr für die Demokratie sehen, schon im Vorfeld diskreditiert bzw. als Spinner abgetan – selbst Journalisten, die sauber recherchieren, wenn sie sich denn noch trauen. Und das, obwohl sich die Faktenlage mühelos überprüfen ließe, sofern die Kritiker ihrer Sorgfaltspflicht nachkämen.

Die Konsequenz der Einschüchterung ist noch problematischer: Der unbedarfte Leser wird in seiner Meinungsbildung manipuliert, ihm wird abtrainiert, sich eigene Gedanken zu Motiven und Hintergründen geostrategischer Einsätze zu machen, so z. B., was die Planung des Irak- wie auch des Afghanistankrieges angeht, aber auch die des Krieges gegen Libyen und die der aktuellen Unruhen in Syrien und im Libanon. Ihnen entgeht, dass hinter all den Auslandsaktivitäten, die nicht selten als humanitäre Hilfseinsätze deklariert werden, in Wirklichkeit kühle und generalstabsmäßige Planungen im Pentagon sowie in den unter einem Dach vereinigten 15 US-Geheimdiensten (United States Intelligence Community) stehen.27

Die Einflussnahme auf die Medien ist keine Erfindung der genannten elitären Machtzirkel. Desinformation und Propaganda gehören zu den Aufgaben jeglicher Geheimdienste. So wundert es nicht, dass Ende der 1940er-Jahre die CIA mit der „Operation Mockingbird“28 ein regelrechtes Programm zur Infiltration und Steuerung der Medienlandschaft aus der Taufe gehoben hat. Mit der Freigabe der geheimen Unterlagen am 26. Juni 2007 durch das amerikanische Nationalarchiv unter dem Namen „Family Jewels“29 konnte die  Steuerung der Medien durch die CIA nachweislich belegt werden.30

Die sogenannten Family Jewels aus dem Jahre 2007 dokumentierten nachweislich die Einflussnahme der CIA auf wichtige Meinungsbildner (Quelle: Screenshot Website des National Security Archive vom Oktober 2012)

………..

Der umtriebige Bilderberger Kissinger ein Kriegsverbrecher?

Dem ehemaligen US-Sicherheitsberater und Außenminister wird heute vorgeworfen, am Putsch in Chile wie an der Ermordung des Präsidenten Allende beteiligt gewesen zu sein und die „Operation Condor“ unterstützt zu haben (vgl. auch „Das Guttenberg-Dossier“). Unter diesem Decknamen folterten und ermordeten in den 1970ern und 1980ern die Militärregierungen von Argentinien, Chile, Paraguay, Uruguay, Bolivien und Brasilien – mit Billigung der USA – tausende Lateinamerikaner. Im Kampf gegen die „internationale terroristische Aggression“ sollten Regimegegner – Linke, Priester, Menschenrechtler – ausgeschaltet werden. Als Opfer der „Operation Condor“ wurden bislang nur einige Hundert Fälle überprüft. Doch die Bilanz der lateinamerikanischen Repressionspolitik ist nach Angaben von Menschenrechtsorganisationen weitaus höher: etwa 50.000 Ermordete, 35.000 Verschollene und 400.000 Gefangene.37 Kissinger droht daher nicht nur Strafverfolgung in Südamerika, sondern auch in mehreren europäischen Ländern, weshalb er nur noch selten die USA verlässt.38

………..

Marcus Klöckner: Bilderberg-Konferenz. Verschwiegene Weltmacht, veröffentlicht am 5. Juni 2008 auf Frankfurter Rundschau online

Bilderberger & Co.: elitäre Machtzirkel im Zerrspiegel von Medien und Wissenschaft

Kategorien:Geo Politik Schlagwörter:

Die westliche Intervention der NATO Staaten in Mali


 

Folge des Verbrechens, ein Sozial Staat Libyen zu zerstören, durch die kriminelle Sarkozy Bande, der aber 50 Millionen € Wahlkampf Hilfe von Gaddafi erhalten hatte. Enigme Pasqua Die Operation SarkoCIA : Wie die CIA einen ihrer Agenten zum Präsidenten der Republik Frankreich machte [Voltaire]

Sarkozy, ein billiger CIA Agent, mit dem Gangster Frank Wisner verbunden.

Kampf gegen Rebellen Frankreich will 2500 Soldaten nach Mali schicken Frankreich will seinen Einsatz in Mali verstärken: Verteidigungsminister Le Drian plant nach einem Medienbericht, die Zahl von derzeit 750 auf 2500 Soldaten zu erhöhen. Die französische Luftwaffe intensivierte unterdessen ihre Angriffe auf Ziele im Norden. Der UN-Sicherheitsrat billigte den Militäreinsatz. Mehr

BBC-Doku: Die Organisation “Al Qaida” hat nie existiert

Von Daniel Neun | 21.September 2009

Boogieman,one or two

Die hochgelobte Filmreihe “The Power of Nightmares” entlarvt die “Terrorwarnungen” neokonservativer Kreise vor einem weltweiten Fantomfeind als innenpolitisches Zweckmittel. Ebenso beleuchtet es den Aufstieg der Neocon-Revolutionäre seit dem 2.Weltkrieg, deren Fall und vernichtenden Niederlage heute die Menschen als Zeitzeugen beiwohnen.

“April, April”, schrieb “Steinberg Recherche” am 10.August, “Al Qaida hat es nie gegeben” (1). Der “Official Wire” (2) schrieb am 8.August, “Die USA und Grossbritannien suchen nach etwas was nie existiert hat”, im Weltinformationsnetz finden sich viele dieser Einträge.

 

aus geopolitiker

Die NATO ist ratlos, weil man mit System nur mit Verbrechern arbeitet und Islamischen Terroristen von Bosnien, Kosovo, Libyen und nun in Syrien

Kategorien:Geo Politik Schlagwörter: ,

US Navy Captains und das Internationale See Recht


Es ist nicht der erste Unfall, wo US Kapitaene die Vorfahrts Regeln in der Strasse von Hormus nicht kennen!

Atom-U-Boot-Kollision in Strasse von Hormuz

Von petrapez | 11.Januar 2013 um 18:11 Uhr

US-U-Boot aus Hawaii rammt Trawler “unbekannter” Nationalität

Die USS Jacksonville (SSN-699), ein Atom-U-Boot der Los-Angeles-Klasse der US Navy wurde am Donnerstagnachmittag eines ihrer beiden Periskope verlustig, nachdem das Kriegsschiff während einer routinemässigen Schleichfahrt einen zivilen Fischkutter rammte. Weiterlesen »

Kategorien:Geo Politik