Jeremy Hammond and: The new „Hero“: EDWARD SNOWDEN, SOURCE OF NSA LEAKS, STEPS FORWARD
noch ein legendärer Hacker: der Millionen emails von Stratfor outete, oft mit brisanten Inhalt, über Regierungs Chefs.
System Adminstrator by the CIA and NSA
Edward Snowden in Hongkong Die Tragik des Whistleblowers
Anklage durch das FBI: John Kralik
Auf einmal ist alles verkehrt: Wie der in Hongkong untergetauchte Enthüller des amerikanischen Bespitzelungsprogramms Prism, Edward Snowden, China und die Welt in große Verwirrung stürzt. Mehr Von Mark Siemons, Peking 9 22
- Informant Edward Snowden: Nichts ist unmöglich
- NSA-Affäre: „Whistleblower“ Snowden will Asylantrag stellen
10 June 2013
Snowden Censored by Craven Media
Mr. Snowden, please send your 41 PRISM slides and other information to less easily cowed and overly coddled commercial outlets than Washington Post and Guardian. Their arm-waving, self-aggrandizing verbosity, after conspiring to obey official demand (below) to censor your information is a pattern well-documented by unfettered disclosure sites. Their piecemealing release is hoary dramatization, diverting cover-up, of failure to deliver untampered material. Your valor is yet to be fully disclosed, do not settle for being seduced by false promises portending being kicked under the bus. Heed this under-bus-kick published today by Secrecy News:
EDWARD SNOWDEN, SOURCE OF NSA LEAKS, STEPS FORWARD… „When you are subverting the power of government– that’s a fundamentally dangerous thing to democracy.“
„I’m willing to go on the record to defend the authenticity [of these disclosures]. This is the truth. This is what’s happening. You should decide whether we need to be doing this,“ he said of his disclosures.
In the history of unauthorized disclosures of classified information, a voluntary admission of having committed such disclosures is the exception, not the norm. And it confers a degree of dignity on the action. Yet it stops short of a full acceptance of responsibility. That would entail surrendering to authorities and accepting the legal consequences of „subverting the power of government“ and carrying out „a fundamentally dangerous thing to democracy.“
And two days ago this go-to-prison kick by The Atlantic:
Whistle-blowing is the moral response to immoral activity by those in power. What’s important here are government programs and methods, not data about individuals. I understand I am asking for people to engage in illegal and dangerous behavior. Do it carefully and do it safely, but — and I am talking directly to you, person working on one of these secret and probably illegal programs — do it.
High officers and rhetoricians convene safe at base to wargame, destined by history, to praise and send youngsters into harm’s way to protect high privilege, then crow about leadership, sacrifice, pretending remorse, gloating in amply-pensioned retirement. Bear in mind, fodder for their ambitions is how they see you imprisoned for disobedience, emblazoned in by-lined headlines, warehoused in vet hospitals, or best, flag-draped in coffins disappearing into vote-rigged databanks.
To effect his plan, Snowden asked for a guarantee that The Washington Post would publish – within 72 hours – the full text of a PowerPoint presentation describing PRISM, a top-secret surveillance program that gathered intelligence from Microsoft, Facebook, Google and other Silicon Valley companies. He also asked that The Post publish online a cryptographic key that he could use to prove to a foreign embassy that he was the document’s source.
Gellman told him the Post would not make any guarantee about what the Post published or when. The Post broke the story two weeks later, on Thursday. The Post sought the views of government officials about the potential harm to national security prior to publication and decided to reproduce only four of the 41 slides, Gellman wrote in his story about their communications.
eines der Fotos
|The whistleblowers are the new generation of American patriots