Archiv

Archive for Oktober 8, 2013

US Ambassador Jeffrey Feltman – Prinz Bandar Plan, um Syrien ins Steinzeit Alter zubomben

Oktober 8, 2013 30 Kommentare

In allen Details wurde nun der Plan aus 2008  bekannt, durch gehackte emails, wie man 2 Milliarden $ an Kosten rechnete, Syrien zu zerstören, was bei wikileaks vor einem Jahr schon bekannt war, duch die veröffentlichten Stratfor emails, welche erst jetzt von einem Leser entdeckt wurden. Die Methoden, mit Kriminellen, Finanzierung mit Drogen Handel sind aber seit den Balkan Kriegen oder in der Iran Contra Affäre schon lange bekannt.

Under-Secretary-General_Jeffrey_Feltman

US Terrorist: Jeffrey Feltmann: UN Under-Secretary General for Political Affairs.

Bandar bin Bush SultanLike Son

Bandar Bush

WIKILEAKS MEMO 2008

Bandar bin “Bush” Sultan, the former Saudi ambassador to the United States, in collaboration with the former U.S. Ambassador in Lebanon, “Jeffrey Feltman“ current ( UN Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs – who was appointed by Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.) plan to overthrow the regime in Syria and to bring Syria back to the “stone age”, according to sources.

Die USA und ihr Partner: Prinz Bandar: Gift Gas für Saddam und nun nach Syrien

John McCain ist sowieso bei jedem kriminellen Mist dabei.

Ein gelöschter Bericht, tauchte wieder durch die gehackten emails bei Stratfor auf, der die Schlüsselrolle des Prinz Bandar darlegt, den Plan mit dem US Botschafter Jeffrey Feltman im Libanon, wie man Syrien durch die Finanzierung von Kriminellen und Terroristen in die Steinzeit zurück bomben will. Es erinnert an den Im Mai 2002 eliminierten US BotschafterJosef Limbrecht in Albanien, der ebenso mit Drogen Terroristen finanzierte in Mazedonien und zuvor in Pakistan die Drogen Küchen aufbaute und kontrollierte.

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered „global intelligence“ company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal’s Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor’s web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

Re: G2/S2 – SYRIA/KSA/US – Media sources reveal details of a conspiracy by Bandar Bin Sultan and Feltman to „destroy“ Syria

Released on 2012-10-10 17:00 GMT

Email-ID 1147153
Date 2011-03-30 11:29:03
From yerevan.saeed@stratfor.com
To analysts@stratfor.com
List-Name analysts@stratfor.com

I am not amazed that this rumors are coming out at this critical time Asad
regime is going through.
The owners of Sham press have been paid by Syrian authorities (if the
website is not owned by the regime) to publish this in the hope of
diverting people’s attention from anti government protests. As usual, this
is a scapegoat tactic by Syrian regime. With the first look at the Arabic
version of the website, one can tell that this is a pro government
website.
Interestingly, the website citing al Ikhbaraya paper, says today, it will
publish the phone calls made by Bandar to the Islamist activists to oppose
Syrian regime.
Keep in mind that Shampress is run and owned by some so
called independent journalists from Damascus. I assure you that no press
can be run from Damascus unless its sanctioned by Assad regime.

……………………………………

http://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/1147153_re-g2-s2-syria-ksa-us-media-sources-reveal-details-of-a.html

The Original Syrian Media Report Revealing Bandar/Feltman Plan To Destroy the Middle East

[Finally found the original report that was carried 2011-03-30 by Syrian Champress site, but no longer to be found there, for some reason.  Found the report on Wikileaks‘ Stratfor file leaks.  Everything that was spelled-out in the report below is proving to be true.  This is a „smoking gun“ pointed at the head of Obama, bearing proof of prior complicity in the countless war crimes committed in Syria, which have played-out since the date of publication.]

Media sources reveal details of a conspiracy by Bandar Bin Sultan and Feltman to “destroy” Syria

http://www.champress.net/index.php?q=en/Article/view/86507

Several media sources have revealed the details of a “well-organized” plan
to destroy Syria and create chaos in the country. The plan is said to be
drawn up by Bandar bin Sultan, the former Saudi ambassador to the United
States, in collaboration with the former U.S. Ambassador in Lebanon,
“Jeffrey Feltman” to overthrow the regime in Syria and to bring Syria back
to the “stone age”, according to the sources.

The lengthy and detailed plan, developed by Bandar bin Sultan and his
friend Feltman in 2008 with a funding reached $ 2 billion, consists of
many items and precise details which significantly intersect with the
incidents of disturbances the city of Daraa has recently witnessed.
According to sources, the plan “strategically” depended on the
exploitation of peoples’ legitimate desire in freedom, dignity and getting
rid of corruption and on the turning of these wishes into a revolt against
the regime through convincing the people that the road to reform from
within the regime is closed and the solution is an all-out revolution.

However, the plan tactically divided Syria into three areas (big cities,
small cities and villages), and the established five types of networks:

1- The “Fuel”: This network comprises educated and unemployed youths who
are to be linked in a decentralized way.

2- The “Thugs” network which includes outlaws and criminals from remote
areas, preferably non-Syrians.

3- The “Ethnic-Sectarian” network which consists of young people with
limited education representing ethnic communities that support or oppose
the president. They must be under the age of 22.

4- The “Media” network that comprises some leaders of civil society
institutions which have European funding not American one.

5- The “Capital” network which comprises traders, companies owners, banks
and commercial centers in Damascus, Aleppo and Homs only.

On how to use these networks and link between each others, the plan
provides for:

The utilization of ambitious young people from the first network (Network
of fuel) through attractive phrases such as:

– You must have a voice

– Change can’t be achieved except by force

– Your future is yours to determine

– Your silence is the cause, and so on a*|.

The plan also provides for exploiting the skills of members of the second
network (Network of thugs) through:

– Training the thugs on professional killing including sniping and
murdering in cold blood.

– Training them on burning public buildings quickly by using flammable
substance.

– Training thugs on penetrating prisons police centers and security
buildings.

According to the plan, members of the third network (sectarian ethnic
netwrok) will be exploited by

– Feeding their strong feeling of support for or opposition against the
President.

– Making them feel that their communities are threatened in all cases.

– Creating the concept of using excessive force against others.

– Convincing them of the idea that all who oppose them in anything are
traitors.

– Leading them to a “state of color blindness”, so see only black and
white.

-Exploitation their age and lack of knowledge of history and geography and
leading them to the brink of being ready to do anything.

The fourth network (media network) will also be exploited to serve the
plan. Members of this network will be recruited and their skills will be
enhanced to lead the (public opinion) through:

– Enabling them to communicate with the media by satellite phone that
can’t be monitored or cut off.

– Promoting them as nationalists and as individuals who don’t oppose to
the regime, but call for civil society.

– Qualifying cadres and training them on techniques of modern media such
as blogging and using the Internet which help them communicate with the
public.

– Holding regular meetings with them and coordinating their efforts so
that no one will contradict the other.

The fifth network (capital network) will be exploited by using their fear
of their money being wasted, so the following must be achieved:

– Linking traders with trade officials in the European embassies under the
cover of trade relations.

– Holding luxurious parties to be attended by businessmen and during which
exclusively Arab Gulf deals and investments are to be made.

– Threatening them with certain sexual relations that are filmed for later
blackmailing them.

– Urging them against the regime and creating ideas such as: “The country
is yours and outsiders control you. The regime makes wealthy people on
your expense. You are the ones who build the country and others rule it.
Bashar al-Assad steals you via taxes and his supporters enjoy it. All your
businesses projects are a loss due to bribery and corruption. Your wealth
is threatened and must be transferred outside Syria because the regime
will collapse. We will make you rule the country after the collapse of the
regime. “

The plan also contained in its “executive” chapter several scenarios, and
precise details of how to start and move, how networks will be exploited
and how to move forward.
According to executive chapter, the plan adopts the following stages:

1- If a targeted person from the Fuel Network responded, another stage
will immediately begin based on exploiting his/her need for money, so the
plan starts to:
– Provide him/her with small amounts of money.
– Ensure him/her a rented car, a cellular phone and Internet connection.
– Ask him/her to look for and bring other young people and use the same
method with them.

– When the number of young people reach 5000 in major cities and 1500 in
small cities and 500 in the villages, these people are asked to start to
express their desire in change and reform. At this very stage any talk
against any side of the people must be avoided. Not a word on sectarian,
partisan, rightist or leftist basis is allowed at this stage.

As this stage proceeds, objections by non-enthusiasts are to be faced by a
set of appropriate responses such as:
– If someone says there is a change, the response must be: “There is no
change at all. This is all a lie”
– If he says change is coming, then the response must be: “We have heard
this for more than 40 years”
– If anyone says that time is not suitable, the response must be: “So when
must we move. Are we going to move after 100 years”
– If one says that of our dignity lies in resisting America, the response
must be: “We have nothing to do with resistance, we want to live” and so
ona*|

– A Moving group has to be pushed into streets inside already existing
gatherings such as in crowded markets, in mosques after prayers and in
narrow alleys. This group is divided into three rings: The shouters, the
photographers, and the hidden people. The shouters gather at the center
of the circle and begin chanting within the gathering. This ring is
surrounded by the ring of the hidden people, while the photographers’ ring
surrounds all. If anyone tried to disperse the shouters the hidden people
defend them under the pretext: ” let them speak”, and if no one try to
disperse them, the same ring of the hidden people assaults the shouters
and disperse them. In both cases,” We get an excellent picture for the
media.”

– In general, the authorities have to be provoked to be drawn into the use
of torture and cruelty. Here the authorities have to choose one of two
solutions; either to intervene or not to intervene.

– If the authorities don’t interfere, the number of enthusiasts will begin
to increase, because young people’s demands will attract a bigger number
of new enthusiasts who all, according to the plan, must not know anything
about the network link.

– If the authorities intervene and arrest one of the network members,
he/she must make himself/herself appear “innocent and pathetic”,
immediately change his/her stance and illusively promise the authorities
not to do that again. According to the plan he/she is to be completely
frozen to the final stage, but funding continues.

– If the authorities intervene and arrest one from outside the network,
the incident must fully be exploited by raising the level of demands. If
the security forces torture him/her, this will be better as it will help
in fueling the people’s feelings and here phrases linking torture to the
whole regime not only to the security forces are to be promoted and the
following statements and ideas are to be disseminated: “Have you seen
what happened to the poor man, this is what the president wants. It isn’t
fair, the man wants only to live. Do those traders only have the right to
have money. Is it a government or a group of thieves. The reason behind
this is the top leadership”, and so on …

2- When moves start in the streets, people must be instigated as fast as
possible to change their just demands into calls for the downfall of the
regime. Here the following must be implemented:

– The second network, “network of the thugs”, is introduced to the scene
immediately to attack all of the demonstrators and security personnel.

– Videos and photos for dramatic events which hurt religious and social
feelings, such as attacking women, preferably veiled ones, must be taken.
As a result alleged demonstrators shout general slogans and if they are
attacked by security forces it will be very excellent. But if they are
attacked by civilians, the group says “security forces dressed in civilian
clothes,” attacked the demonstrators. However, if no one attack them, a
member of the same group will attack the demonstrators, even if this leads
to minor injuries. Video shots must not last more than 20 seconds and they
must be taken from a very close position not from a far one.

– The rapid use of bloodshed, because of its significant impact on the
people. This includes the killing of a protester from outside the network,
preferably a youth from big and famous families, or a youth who has major
social ties or a highly educated person, especially a doctor, an engineer
or an intellectual. The killing must be committed rapidly by snipers and
with bullets of the same type used by police or security forces. This
stage also includes the killing of security personnel or guarding police.

– Burning properties of the traders who have been involved in the plan and
dragging them into a state of fear together with other economic figures
with the purpose of having influence on the lives of as many people as
possible.

– Provoking Bashar al-Assad loyalists and engaging them in polemics with
others, especially the Islamists,. Here the loyalist are to be accused of
being from the intelligence and that they are horns of the regime and
beneficiaries from the authority.
Creating mistrust and tension between the loyalists and the people,
telling about the near end of Bashar al-Assad and calling for random
supportive demonstrations and calls advocating slaughter, murder and
terrorism are planned to be launched. In turn, opponents keep calm and
delay any move till after the creation of sectarian and ethnic killing.
They have to be well-organized in their calls for political reform,
freedom, democracy and civil life.

– Foiling any attempt to attain political solutions by the regime through
burning symbols of power such as the Baath Party headquarters, police
stations, prisons and security forces centers in addition to distorting
Bashar al-Assad pictures.
3- The fourth network (The media) is introduced. The aim here is to link
Bashar al-Assad to all previous era and to devalue all his actions by
opening all the old files and holding the current regime responsible for
them.

Bandar bin Sultan recognizes in his plan that Bashar Assad enjoys a real
popularity inside and outside Syria that should not be underestimated. He
believes that this popularity must be exploited and transformed from a
point of strength into a point of weakness through the use of the
enthusiasm of supporters against demonstrations.

To undermine the military, the government and the security system, Bandar
believes that they must be torn into sects, and here comes the role of the
third network the ( “ethnic-sectarian” network) taking into account the
neutralization of major doctrines like the Shafi’I and the Hanafi. This
will be done as follows:

– Urging each sect to commit horrible bloody massacres against violators.
These crimes must be filmed and posted to the media as soon as possible.
The start should be in places far from Damascus and there should not be a
lot of blood for fear that people may retreat.

For instance, in Lattakia and Tartous, people from the Alawite sect from
the network slaughter youths from the Sunni sect, cut parts of their
bodies chant long live Bashar.
In Aleppo, Salafis from the network attack Alawites’ villages, burn their
homes and terrorizing the people to leave their villages and chant “Death
to the “Nasirien” death to the enemies of the Sahaba”.
In Hasakah, Arabs from the network slaughter and hang some young people
and make fun of the Kurds in a visual way without language and clear
enough to be understood by the Kurds without translation. Some Christians,
particularly Armenians are planned to be killed.
In Daraa, “snipers” from outside the city of Daraa kill young people from
the Jawabra and the Mahamid families without approaching anyone from the
Abazeed and the Masalmeh families.

In the city of Al-Boukamal, the Shi’ites kill Sunnis and scream, “Oh
Karbala, Oh Hussein”.
In Homs, Arabs kill Turkmen and loot their shops, particularly gold shops
and also kill Catholic Christians and Murshdis.
In Sewidaa, Druze members of the network kill a number of Christians in
surrounding villages and burning several churches
In Qamishli, Kurd members of the network avenge the killing of Kurds in
Hasaka. Some Armenians also kill Arab Muslims.
In Deir Ez-Zour, “snipers” from outside the city kill young people from
the Agidat and Bani Naeem tribes without approaching smaller tribes like
the “Rolla”, the “Jabour” or the “Shummar” and scream during the filming
in the name of the “Bokhabour and the “Mohassan”.

Bandar thinks that the regime as a whole will be busy trying to settle the
disputes between communities and ethnic groups. Bashar al-Assad will send
delegates from his government to resolve sectarian and ethnic differences
while Damascus will be empty of government pillars and here comes the turn
of Damascus where each minority group avenge and the city flares up from
all sides. This will be done as follows:

– The Christians in the east of Damascus kill Muslims who live among them
in areas like Qassaa and Bab Touma. They also kill the Druze in the
village of Jaramana.

– The Sunnis in the south of the city kill Shiites living among them in
the “Shaghour” and the “Muhajereen” areas.

– Salafis in the areas of “Duma” and “Darayya” burn the headquarters of
the municipality, courts and police stations.

– Alawites in the west of the city in “Mezze Jabal” area kill Sunnis who
live among them.

– Kurds in the north of the city in “Rukn Eddin” area attack Arabs from
all sects.

Meanwhile, Bandar believes that the army will be divided, the security
systems and the government will collapse and Bashar will only have the
Republican Guard, which he will not be able to move because the army will
stand against him. This will make Bashar al-Assad’s presence in power the
cause of all problems, and here comes the role of the fifth network the
(network of the capital). The following has to be implemented:

..

http://therearenosunglasses.wordpress.com/2013/07/29/the-original-syrian-media-report-revealing-bandarfeltman-plan-to-destroy-the-middle-east/

“Sarin-U.N.O.-Beauftragter” Sellström tief in europäischer Sicherheitsarchitektur des Stockholm-Programms verstrickt

NATO Länder und die Gift Waffen Lieferungen an Syrien, Irak, Iran

Der Flotten Aufmarsch der Kriegs Treiber gegen Syrien im Mittelmeer

Syria’s Creative Response to International Nonchalance: Kafranbel Our Ambassador

SEPTEMBER 2013
Iran-Contra Redux? Prince Bandar Heads Secret Saudi-CIA Effort to Aid Syrian Rebels, Topple Assad

The Wall Street Journal recently revealed new details about how Prince Bandar bin Sultan al-Saud — Saudi’s former ambassador to the United States — is leading the effort to prop up the Syrian rebels. Intelligence agents from Saudi Arabia, the United States, Jordan and other allied states are working at a secret joint operations center in Jordan to train and arm hand-picked Syrian rebels. The Journal also reports Prince Bandar has been jetting from covert command centers near the Syrian front lines to the Élysée Palace in Paris and the Kremlin in Moscow, seeking to undermine the Assad regime. “Really what he’s doing is he’s reprising a role that he played in the 1980s when he worked with the Reagan administration to arrange money and arms for mujahideen fighters in Afghanistan and also worked with the CIA in Nicaragua to support the Contras,” says Wall Street Journal reporter Adam Entous. “So in many ways this is a very familiar position for Prince Bandar, and it’s amazing to see the extent to which veterans of the CIA were excited to see him come back because, in the words of a diplomat who knows Bandar, he brings the Arabic term wasta, which means under-the-table clout. You know his checks are not going to bounce and that he’ll be able to deliver the money from the Saudis.”

http://dirtytrainers.org/bandar-bush-and-jeffrey-feltman-bring-syria-back-to-the-stone-age/

Kategorien:Allgemein

Die Weltbank als Partner Berufs krimineller Zirkel reguliert nicht die ICSID Verfahren

Oktober 8, 2013 17 Kommentare

Es dürfte wohl unterschiedliche Probleme geben, wobei auch Staaten massiv betrügen und man Grundstücke zur Verfügung stellt, später lokale Kriminelle der Politik, die Grundstücke wild bebauen, wo dann keine Polizei noch Justiz funktioniert. Ja sogar mehrfach Verkäufe, auch von Lizensen gibt es, mehrfach Grundstücks Verkäufe usw.

ICSID

 

Wenn Staaten dem Profit schaden
08.10.2013
BERLIN
(Eigener Bericht) – Bundesdeutsche Konzerne suchen ihre Profitinteressen immer häufiger mit Prozessen gegen souveräne Staaten durchzusetzen. Dabei geht es nicht nur um Verstaatlichungen, sondern auch um Steuererhöhungen, den Widerruf von Genehmigungen, neue Umweltgesetze oder auch um das Verbot von Produkten sowie Gewinntransfers. „Die mögliche Vielfalt schädlichen staatlichen Handelns ist praktisch unbegrenzt“, heißt es in einer Rechtshilfe-Publikation der bundeseigenen deutschen Außenwirtschaftsagentur „Germany Trade and Invest“ (gtai). Bereits 27 Mal haben Siemens, E.ON, Daimler, Hochtief, Wintershall und andere deutsche Unternehmen das „Internationale Zentrum zur Beilegung von Investitionsstreitigkeiten“ (ICSID) oder andere Institutionen angerufen, um ihre Gewinne zu sichern. Berlin setzt sich weiterhin für umfassende Investoren-Schutzrechte ein, die als Grundlage für ICSID-Verfahren dienen. Nichtregierungsorganisationen und Gewerkschaften kritisieren die wachsende Macht des intransparenten supranationalen Rechtsinstituts, das keinerlei demokratischer Kontrolle unterliegt.
Hilfe, ich werde enteignet!
„Staaten können die Profitabilität einer Investition auf vielfältige Weise beeinträchtigen“, erklärt die bundeseigene Außenwirtschaftsagentur „Germany Trade and Invest“ (gtai) in ihrer Publikation „Hilfe, ich werde enteignet!“[1] Nicht nur Verstaatlichungen, sondern auch Steuererhöhungen, neue Umweltgesetze, den Widerruf von Genehmigungen, das Untersagen von Gewinn-Transfers ins Heimatland und Verbote bestimmter Produkte zählt die Schrift zu solchen profitschädigenden Hemmnissen. Als Fälle „schleichende(r) Enteignung“ haben demnach überdies die Abschaffung von Sonderwirtschaftszonen, die Absenkung von Tarifen im Energie- oder Telekommunikationsbereich, das Aufkündigen von Verträgen oder die Abwertung von Landeswährungen zu gelten. Da die nationalen Gerichte nach Ansicht von gtai nur unzureichend vor solchen „politischen Risiken“ schützen, rät die Agentur den betroffenen Konzernen, vor das „Internationale Zentrum zur Beilegung von Investitionsstreitigkeiten“ (International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, ICSID) zu ziehen.
Hochtief vs. Argentinien
Das 1965 gegründete und an die Weltbank angegliederte ICSID mit Sitz in Washington verzeichnete bis Ende 2012 insgesamt 514 Verfahren, deren Rechtsgrundlage jeweils die zwischen den betroffenen Nationen geschlossenen Investitionsschutz-Abkommen bilden. Weitere Streitfälle liegen dem „International Chamber of Commerce“, der WTO-Institution UNCITRAL und anderen Einrichtungen vor. Bundesdeutsche Firmen haben diese Schiedsgerichte bisher 27 Mal angerufen. So berät das ICSID zurzeit über eine Klage von Hochtief gegen Argentinien. Ein Konsortium unter Beteiligung des Bau-Konzerns hatte 1997 den Zuschlag bekommen, im Rahmen einer „Public Private Partnership“ eine 60 Kilometer lange Maut-Autobahn mitsamt Brücken zu errichten. Weil die Firmen, bedingt durch die Wirtschaftskrise von 2001 und deren Folgen, in ökonomische Schwierigkeiten gerieten, die Fristen nicht einhalten konnten und außerdem die Kosten explodierten, drang der Staat, der den Unternehmen zusätzliche Darlehen in Höhe von 42 Millionen US-Dollar gewährt hatte, auf Neuverhandlungen.[2] Hochtief zeigte sich mit den Ergebnissen jedoch nicht zufrieden und schaltete das ICSID ein, das bis dato noch keine Entscheidung gefällt hat.
Bestochen? Macht nichts
Auch Siemens zitierte Argentinien vor das Washingtoner Gericht. Der Konzern hatte von dem südamerikanischen Land 1998 den Auftrag für die Herstellung neuer Personalausweise und die Ausstattung von Grenzübergängen mit Lesegeräten erhalten.[3] Da er sich aber nicht an den vereinbarten Kostenrahmen hielt und zudem fehlerhaft arbeitete – die Techniker hatten die Fingerabdrücke seitenverkehrt in die Dokumente eingelassen -, kündigte Argentinien den Vertrag. Siemens zog 2002 vor das ICSID und bekam 2009 in letzter Instanz Recht; die Richter verurteilten den souveränen Staat zu einer Entschädigung von 217 Millionen US-Dollar. Da sie lediglich der Wahrung des Investitionsschutzes verpflichtet sind, hatten die von Siemens im Zuge der Ausschreibung gezahlten Bestechungsgelder in Höhe von zehn Millionen Dollar keinerlei Einfluss auf ihre Entscheidung.
Vom Recht auf Preiserhöhungen
Daimler verklagte Argentinien unter anderem wegen Verlusten, die sich 2002 aus der Abwertung der einheimischen Währung nach Auflösung der Dollar-Bindung ergaben. E.ON rief das ICSID an, da die Regulierungsbehörden der Slowakei dem Konzern keine Gaspreis-Erhöhungen genehmigen wollten. Gelsenwasser initierte gleich mehrere Verfahren gegen den algerischen Staat, der die Verzögerungen bei den Arbeiten zur Privatisierung der Wasserversorgung von Annaba nicht länger duldete und deshalb den entsprechenden Vertrag aufkündigte. Weitere Verfahren strengten Klöckner, Wintershall und Fraport an.
Klagen gegen Krisenverluste
Bei ICSID und anderen Stellen, die von deutschen Konzernen genutzt werden, sind auch deutsche Juristen stark präsent. Rechtsanwaltskanzleien wie Luther, Gröpper Köpke oder Gleiss Lutz vertreten zahlreiche Kläger und Beklagte oder stellen Schiedsgerichtsrichter. 43 bundesdeutsche Schlichter standen bereits in ICSID-Diensten. Bei Stundensätzen von bis zu 1.000 US-Dollar, Prozesskosten von durchschnittlich acht Millionen US-Dollar und hohen Streitwerten stellen die Verfahren eine lukrative Einnahmequelle dar. Allein die bisherigen Fälle der Luther Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft sind sechs Milliarden Euro schwer. Aktuell vertritt die Kanzlei Vattenfall im Verfahren gegen die Bundesrepublik; der schwedische Stromkonzern fordert eine Entschädigung in Höhe von rund 3,7 Milliarden Euro – mit der Begründung, die Energiewende sei wegen ihrer Auswirkungen auf Atomkraft-Investitionen ein Instrument der indirekten Enteignung. Die Luther-Juristen, die im Auftrag von gtai auch die Schrift „Hilfe, ich werde enteignet!“ verfassten, versuchten sogar, die Griechenland-Krise für den Gewinn neuer Mandate zu nutzen. Besitzern griechischer Staatsanleihen rieten sie „angesichts des unsauberen griechischen Finanzgebarens“ zu Klagen vor den Schiedsgerichten gegen Athen.[4]
Regulation als „Enteignung“
Obwohl die Bundesrepublik selbst zu den Beklagten zählt, setzen sich deutsche Politiker in den aktuellen Verhandlungen der Europäischen Union mit Indien, Kanada und Singapur über Freihandelsabkommen für die Verankerung eines strengen Investorenschutzes ein. So plädieren bundesdeutsche Vertreter für die Aufnahme strikter Regelungen in den Vertrag mit Indien. „DEU betonte das Interesse an einem hohen Schutzniveau von Investitionen entsprechend dem erteilten Verhandlungsmandat und bat um aktuelle Texte. Zudem mahnte DEU, nicht zu früh IND gegenüber Zugeständnisse zu machen“, heißt es in EU-Dokumenten, die german-foreign-policy.com vorliegen. In den Pakt mit Singapur wollen die Unterhändler sogar Sicherheitsstandards aufgenommen wissen, die über diejenigen des nordamerikanischen Freihandelsabkommens NAFTA hinausgehen. Auch beim CETA-Handelsabkommen mit Kanada verfolgen sie dieses Ziel. Darüber hinaus warnen die Delegierten vor Enteignungen unter dem Deckmantel nationaler Interessen: „Das Recht zu regulieren, das CETA derzeit der kanadischen Regierung zugesteht, um Arbeitsrechts- und Umweltgesetze erlassen zu können, darf nicht als Vorwand für indirekte Enteignungen legaler ausländischer Investitionen dienen.“
Aushöhlung demokratischer Souveränität
Das ICSID und ähnliche Institutionen sehen sich inzwischen wachsender Kritik ausgesetzt. Der US-amerikanische Gewerkschaftsdachverband AFL-CIO etwa warnt vor einer Aushöhlung der staatlichen Souveränität und betrachtet ICSID als ein „ungerechtfertigtes Risiko für die inländische Politik auf lokaler, staatlicher oder föderaler Ebene“.[5] Andere Organisationen monieren die Intransparenz der Kammern, die sich jeglicher demokratischen Kontrolle entziehen und nur Unternehmen das Klagerecht zugestehen.
Prozesskosten statt Lehrergehälter
Die enge Ausrichtung auf das Wohl der Investoren führt den Initiativen zufolge auch dazu, die wirtschaftliche Gesamtkonstellation, in der die Streitfälle stehen, zu vernachlässigen und die Folgen der Prozesse außer Acht zu lassen. So musste die philippinische Regierung nach Angaben von „Corporate Europe Observatory“ (CEO) in der juristischen Auseinandersetzung mit Fraport über einen Flughafenbau bereits 58 Millionen US-Dollar für ihre Verteidigung aufwenden: „Geld, mit dem sie 12.500 Lehrerinnen und Lehrer entlohnen oder gleich zwei neue Flughäfen hätte bauen können“, konstatiert Pia Eberhardt von CEO.[6] Aus all diesen Gründen hat ein Zusammenschluss aus 863 NGOs schon 2007 einen Appell an den damaligen Weltbank-Präsidenten Robert B. Zoellick gerichtet. „Die Weltbank sollte ein unabhängiges Prüfungspanel einrichten, um zu analysieren, wie das ICSID (und die von ihm exekutierten Investment- und Handelsabkommen) andere internationale Verträge, die der Förderung der Sozial-, Wirtschafts- und Menschenrechte dienen, genauso unterhöhlen wie die Fähigkeit der Entwicklungsländer, ihre externen Schulden zu reduzieren und die Millenium-Entwicklungsziele zu erreichen“, hieß es in dem Aufruf.[7] Ein Reaktion von seiten der Weltbank steht bis heute aus.
[1] „Hilfe, ich werde enteignet!“; http://www.gtai.de
[2] Argentinisches Tageblatt vom 20. Mai 2006; http://www.tageblatt.com.ar
[3] Lateinamerika Nachrichten Nr. 409/410; www. lateinamerikanachrichten.de
[4] Luther News 16. August 2011
[5] A Transatlantic Corporate Bill Of Rights, http://www.corporateeurope.org
[6] Konzerne versus Staaten: Mit Schiedsgerichten gegen die Demokratie; Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik 4/2013
[7] http://www.twnside.org.sg
Kategorien:Europa Schlagwörter: