Archive for November 2013

China und die USA – War Fears Rise After China Missile Tests Over Oregon

November 28, 2013 1 Kommentar

November 22, 2013

War Fears Rise After China Missile Tests Over Oregon

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers


The Ministry of Defense (MoD) is reporting today that the Vityaz early-warning radar system deployed along the entire Russian border has confirmed the Republic of China Navy (ROCN) launching from their Type 092 Xia-class nuclear ballistic-missile submarine (SSBN) of two atomic JL-2 missiles off the Northeast American coastline near the State of Oregon on Wednesday 30 October and Wednesday 20 November.

According to this report, these two latest sub-launched nuclear ballistic tests by China off the west coast of the United States were preceded by a similar test conducted on Monday 10 November 2010 when a Chinese Navy Jin class ballistic missile nuclear submarine, deployed secretly from its underground home base on the south coast of Hainan island, launched an intercontinental ballistic missile from international waters off the southern California coast in full view of Los Angeles.

As the Pentagon and their US mainstream media sycophants covered up the 10 November 2010 China missile launch, this MoD report continues, they have likewise labeled the 30 October missile launch as a fireball-meteor and the 20 November one as ‘maybe’ another fireball-meteor or contrail.

Important to note, Russian intelligence analysts in this report say, was that China cryptically warned the US about its planned 30 October launch test when on Sunday 27 October the world was given a rare glimpse into China’s nuclear-powered submarine fleet, with State-owned media carrying extensive coverage of the previously mysterious strategic deterrence force.

The unprecedented revealing of the underwater fleet was a demonstration of China’s confidence in its sea-based nuclear strike capability and serves as a deterrent to any attempted provocation amid the changing geopolitical situation, said military observers.

Starting on Sunday 27 October, China Central Television carried serial coverage two days in a row on the submarine force of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Navy’s Beihai fleet in its flagship news program Xinwen Lianbo.

The People’s Daily, the PLA Daily and the China Youth Daily on Monday all carried front-page stories, features and commentaries on the submarine force, applauding its achievements since the launch of China’s first nuclear-powered submarine in December 1970.

To the most chilling warning to the Obama regime from China regarding these missile tests the Washington Times News Service further reports:

“Chinese calculations for nuclear attacks on the U.S. are chillingly macabre.

“Because the Midwest states of the U.S. are sparsely populated, in order to increase the lethality, [our] nuclear attacks should mainly target the key cities on the West Coast of the United States, such as Seattle, Los Angeles, San Francisco and San Diego,” the Global Times said.

“The 12 JL-2 nuclear warheads carried by one single Type 094 SSBN can kill and wound 5 million to 12 million Americans,” the Global Times reported.

China also has developed land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles — notably the DF-31A, which has a range of 7,000 to 7,500 miles.

“If we launch our DF 31A ICBMs over the North Pole, we can easily destroy a whole list of metropolises on the East Coast and the New England region of the U.S., including Annapolis, Philadelphia, New York, Boston, Portland, Baltimore and Norfolk, whose population accounts for about one-eighth of America’s total residents.”

All the state-run press reports stressed the point that the PLA’s missile submarines are now on routine strategic patrol, “which means that China for the first time has acquired the strategic deterrence and second strike capability against the United States.”

Though the American people themselves have been kept in near total ignorance of the coming war between them and China, the same cannot be said of the rest of the world, including Doug Saunders of The Globe and Mail, Canada’s leading newspaper, who reported in its 15 July edition that the United States and China have been preparing for an all-out war and which we, in part, quote from The Nation News Service:

“Both the Pentagon and the People’s Liberation Army are building up their military strategies. It appears that a global war is in the making.

Saunders wrote that the Pentagon is proceeding with war preparations without oversight from the White House or Congress. This gives the impression that the Pentagon is operating as an independent state within the state. The Pentagon is relying on the AirSea Battle strategy, in which the US Army and Air Force will stand ready to support 320,000 military personnel in a simultaneous land and air attack against China in the event of a spillover war in the South China Sea or surrounding areas.

President Obama has spoken of a pivot to Asia, followed by the US Defence Department’s plan to move most of the US naval capability to the Asia Pacific to counter the rise of China. We can feel that the US military, in spite of the turmoil in Syria, Egypt and the Middle East, is re-asserting its influence in the Asia-Pacific. The US and China are now engaging in a full-scale currency war. A physical war could be the inevitable course. A rise of China threatens the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency and the US supremacy.

On China’s side, we can assume that the Chinese leadership has ordered a full preparation for a war with the United States. China has secretly built up its military capability, with modern weapons and sophisticated technology. China said it is ready to develop an anti-AirSea Battle strategy. China’s President has urged the military to prepare for the war and to fight to win.”

To how soon open warfare between China and the US will break out this report doesn’t say.  However, it does note that China’s “bombshell move” against the US Dollar this week makes its likelihood much sooner than later.

In further reporting on China’s move against the US Dollar the dissident American website states:

“China just dropped an absolute bombshell, but it was almost entirely ignored by the mainstream media in the United States.  The central bank of China has decided that it is “no longer in China’s favor to accumulate foreign-exchange reserves”.  During the third quarter of 2013, China’s foreign-exchange reserves were valued at approximately $3.66 trillion. 

For years, China has been systematically propping up the value of the U.S. dollar and keeping the value of the yuan artificially low.  This has resulted in a massive flood of super cheap products from across the Pacific that U.S. consumers have been eagerly gobbling up.

And now China has apparently decided that there is not much gutting of our economy left to do and that it is time to let the dollar collapse.”

November 22, 2013 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.

[Ed. Note: Western governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagrees with in believing that it is every human beings right to know the truth.  Due to our missions conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ against us has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit and which is addressed in the report “Who Is Sorcha Faal?”.]

Obama Screams For War As Global Economy Implodes

Snowden Revelations Strike Fear Into Putin

Apocalypse Slams Into America, Few Notice

Kategorien:Geo Politik Schlagwörter: ,

Al-Qaeda responsible for Iran Embassy

Al-Qaeda responsible for Iran Embassy attack: Berri (Video)
Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri says that the bomb blasts targeting the Iranian Embassy in Beirut were carried out by militants linked to al-Qaeda terrorists.

In a joint press conference with Majlis Speaker Ali Larijani in Tehran on Monday, Berri offered his condolences to the Iranian nation and said all Lebanese groups have condemned the terrorist attack.

Commenting on Iran’s nuclear deal with the sextet of world powers, Berri said that Tehran achieved a nuclear victory through prudence.

Larijani said he had discussed bilateral ties and sensitive regional developments with his Lebanese counterpart. He also stressed that Iran can establish strong relations in the region.

On Saturday, Lebanese authorities identified a Palestinian national who lived in southern Lebanon, as the second bomber responsible for attacking Iranian Embassy.

On Friday, Lebanese national Mouin Abu Daher was named as one of the bombers who targeted the Iranian Embassy. He was from the southern port city of Sidon. Abu Daher was identified through DNA tests on his father, Adnan.

Abu Daher was said to be a follower of Salafi Sheikh Ahmed al-Assir, whose supporters fought with Lebanese army for two days in June after blocking themselves at a mosque in the city of Sidon.

The two blasts outside Iran’s diplomatic mission in the southern neighborhood of Janah in Beirut left at least 25 people dead, including six Iranian nationals, and wounded over 150 others on Tuesday.

According to reports, the first explosion took place when a bomber blew his explosives near the gate of the embassy, and the second blast happened just meters away when a car bomb went off.

An al-Qaeda-linked group, Abdullah Azzam Brigades, has claimed responsibility for the twin bombings.

Following the attacks, the United Nations Security Council and the UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon issued statements and “strongly condemned” the blasts.


Russland will in Zypern die Luftwaffen Basis benutzen – Russia asks Cyprus to use its air base

Die Amerikaner und NATO werden wohl erneut ausrasten, wie es bei Gaddafi war, wenn tatsächlich in Zypern Verhandlungen aufgenommen werden.

Russia asks Cyprus to use its air base

Government stuck between US and Russia over airbase use

Government stuck between US and Russia over airbase use News- Defence Minister Fotis Fotiou at the Andreas Papandreou airbase

By Stefanos Evripidou
CYPRUS APPEARS to be stuck between a rock and a hard place over a Russian request for use of its Andreas Papandreou military airbase in Paphos, it emerged on Saturday.
Local daily Simerini reported on Saturday that the military airbase southwest of the island has become a bone of contention between Russia and the US, causing headaches for the government.
According to the paper, the Russian government wants to rent permanent space at the airbase for military purposes, as opposed to adopting the practice of other ‘friendly’ states who from time to time request use of facilities, approval of which remains at the Cyprus government’s discretion.
The US is reportedly not happy with the Russian request and would see a positive response from Nicosia in a negative light.
The government, said Simerini, remains stuck in the middle of the dispute between the two permanent members of the UN Security Council (UNSC), fearful of upsetting relations with Russia (Cyprus’ main ally in the UNSC) or the US or both.
According to the paper’s sources, consultations with the Russian government to find a solution that would satisfy both sides is ongoing, but has yet to yield results.
Asked to comment on Saturday, Defence Minister Fotis Fotiou all but confirmed the report, saying he did not want to comment directly on such a serious and sensitive issue related to Cyprus’ foreign policy.
The ministries of defence and foreign affairs will cooperate responsibly and take the “right” decision, “always taking into account the country’s national interests”, he said.
Fotiou highlighted the importance of maintaining the growing geostrategic and geopolitical importance of Cyprus which can play a stabilising role in the region.
Asked whether the US has “reprimanded” the government for the facilitations offered to Russia, Fotiou said: “No one has pressed us and what matters is through a proper consultation with friendly countries to take the right decisions.”
He noted that “Russia remains a long-standing supporter of our positions on the national issue” while Cyprus also has friendly relations with the US and other neighbouring countries in the region.
“It is clearly a matter of the Cypriot government taking a decision and such decisions are not taken under any pressure from anyone,” he said.

Kategorien:Geo Politik

Angola verbietet als erster Staat auf der Welt den Islam

Islam Banned in Angola

Added by Nicci Mende on November 24, 2013.
Saved under Africa, Lina Bouc, Nicci Mende, Op-ed, World
Tags: ,

islam, banned, angola, africa, muslim

Islam Ban: Questionable Future for Mosques in Angola

While the constitution in Angola guarantees freedom of religion to all of its citizens, this right no longer seems to apply to the followers of the now banned religion of Islam. According to numerous newspapers in Angola, the African nation has banned the Islamic religion. It has become the first country in the world to take such a harsh stance against Muslims.

On November 22, the Angolan Minister of Culture Rosa Cruz e Silva said that “[t]he process of legalization of Islam has not been approved by the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights [and so] their mosques would be closed until further notice.” Why the religion needs to be legalized has not been definitively stated by Cruz e Silva.

Cruz e Silva has also said that the closing of mosques is the most recent move in Angola’s effort to but a stop to so-called illegal religious sects. Under new laws in Angola, many religious sects have suddenly become criminal.

On November 24, Angola President José Eduardo dos Santos said that the country is working toward putting an end to Islamic influence in Angola once and for all. Again, there is no word of what or who has been influenced and why it needs to stop.

The Governor of Luanda, Bento Bento, has said that “radical” Muslims are not welcome in the country and that the Angolan government will not be legalizing mosques or other places of worship for Muslims.

Islam Banned in Angola

Small African Nation of Angola

The African country of Angola’s citizens primarily practice indigenous religions. Recent surveys show that 47 percent adhere to traditional indigenous beliefs while another 38 percent of the population practice Roman Catholicism and 15 percent practice Protestantism.

The now banned religion of Islam is practiced by a very small percentage of the 18.5 million inhabitants of Angola. Only about 80,000-90,000 Angolans practice Islam. These Muslims are primary migrants from West Africa and Lebanon.

While the means of becoming a “legal religion” is Angola is not clear at this point, the government is very harshly cracking down on the illegal sects. Minister of Culture Rosa Cruz e Silva has made it known that there are nearly 200 different illegal religious sects in Angola so it is not just Islam that has been banned in Angola.

Rosa Cruz e Silva has also said that there are more than 1000 applications that have been submitted by religious groups in an effort to legalize their sects. Islamic groups have made up some percentage of these many applications but it is not clear when or if they will ever be approved. Rosa Cruz e Silva said that the legalization process of Islam has simply not been approved and, therefore, mosques must remain closed “until further notice.”…….

Kategorien:Spezial Schlagwörter:

Mit dem Kennedy Mord, begann die Umwandlung der USA in eine kriminelles Enterprise

Vor 50 Jahren wurde in Dallas der Weg zur nuklearen Bewaffnung des Kolonial-Regimes zionistischer Rassisten über Palästina freigeschossen

21. November 2013

Mordechai Vanunu: Israel killed JFK

Angesichts dessen, dass am morgigen Freitag der 50. Jahrestag der Ermordung von John F. Kennedy ist, soll an dieser Stelle jedem, der es noch nicht getan hat, die Lektüre des sich mit diesem Ereignis beschäftigenden Buches “Final Judgement” empfohlen sein.

Zu den Auswirkungen der Ermordung von JFK sei nochmals auf den nunmehr fast zwei Jahre alten Parteibuch-Artikel “Der Beginn der großen Macht der Israel-Lobby in den USA” verwiesen. Wer dieses Stück Geschichte begreift, dem sollte es auch nicht schwer fallen, zu verstehen, warum das US-Regime, Tel Aviv und die in der “westlichen Wertegemeinschaft” gemeinhin “freie Presse” genannte zionistische Lügenpropaganda sich bislang erfolgreich einer jeden seriösen Aufklärung der Terroranschläge vom 11. September 2001 widersetzen können, warum die für den Angriffskrieg gegen den Irak verantwortlichen Verbrecher nicht zur Rechenschaft gezogen werden und dass die Mördebande sich sogar so sicher fühlt, dass sie sich getraut hat, zur Durchsetzung ihrer Ziele in Damaskus gerade noch einen fürchterlichen False-Flag-Anschlag zu verbrechen.

Gaddafi kritisierte 2012 und 2008 das Saudi Arabische Köng Haus, Israel, die USA wegen ihrer Politik gegen die Palästinenser usw.. Praktisch war das sein Todes Urteil, denn beide Regierungen sind Verbündete u.a. über den US Gangster Richard Perle und anderer Geschäftemacher des Todes. Gaddafi störte die Geschäfte der NeoLiberalten Verbrecher Organisationen wie der NATO, HRW, TI und Weltbank.

Die Ermordung von Gaddafi und seiner Begleitung.. Aktiv dabei wie immer der Britische Geheimdienst, der US Botschafter wurden später als CIA Man umgebracht, der die Unruhen anzettelte mit Kriminellen und Terroristen. Voraus Gesagt in 2011

Rede gegen das Saudi König Haus vor der UN usw..

Kategorien:Geo Politik

Der US Milliardär Adelson Sheldon fordert einen Nuklear Angriff auf den Iran – Sheldon Adelson Says Obama Should Nuke Iran

November 18, 2013 1 Kommentar

Sheldon Adelson Says Obama Should Nuke Iran (Video)

The Huffington Post  |  By Posted: 10/23/2013 12:45 pm EDT  |  Updated: 10/23/2013 1:01 pm EDT

Get Politics Newsletters:

Casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson told a crowd at Yeshiva University in New York on Tuesday that the only proper negotiating tactic with Iran would be fire a nuclear missile at the country and threaten to wipe out the entire population of Tehran, the nation’s capital.

Adelson, the largest donor to the Republican Party and its affiliated groups, made the comments during a panel discussion hosted by Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, Wall Street Journal columnist Bret Stephens and Yeshiva University President Richard Joel. Adelson’s remarks were videotaped by Philip Weiss of the news site Mondoweiss:

What are we going to negotiate about? I would say „Listen, you see that desert out there, I want to show you something.“ … You pick up your cell phone and you call somewhere in Nebraska and you say, „OK let it go.“ And so there’s an atomic weapon, goes over ballistic missiles, the middle of the desert, that doesn’t hurt a soul. Maybe a couple of rattlesnakes, and scorpions, or whatever. Then you say, „See! The next one is in the middle of Tehran. So, we mean business. You want to be wiped out? Go ahead and take a tough position and continue with your nuclear development. You want to be peaceful? Just reverse it all, and we will guarantee you that you can have a nuclear power plant for electricity purposes, energy purposes.“

The comments came in response to questions about the recent diplomatic detente between the United States and Iran as the two sides seek an agreement over the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program and an end to the economic sanctions imposed on the country.

An overly aggressive U.S. foreign policy stance against Iran has been a driving force behind Adelson’s political giving. In the 2012 election Adelson and his family gave more than $100 million to super PACs and other groups supporting Republican candidates. He held high-dollar fundraisers for Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney and even accompanied Romney when he travelled to Israel during the campaign.

Adelson is also a staunch supporter and major funder of right-wing political parties in Israel, where campaign finance laws allow parties and candidates to accept campaign contributions from foreigners. He has funded the largest circulation newspaper in his effort to provide editorial support for right-wing political efforts.

Kategorien:Geo Politik Schlagwörter: ,

US Strategische Projekte – Oil And The Battle For Chechnya



NATO’s Secret Islamic Jihad
Oil And The Battle For Chechnya
A Caucasian Republic In An Oil And Gas Transit Corridor
Between The Caspian And Black Seas

At least 11 of the 9/11 al-Qaeda hijackers travelled to Chechnya between 1996 and 2000.“
Chechen rebels were feared for suicidal courage and cruelty
London Times, 20 April 2013, Print Edition, P 9

„Russian President Vladimir Putin says he hopes the April 15 Boston Marathon bombings will bring Russia and the United States closer together in combating terrorism…. U.S. and Russian authorities are investigating why deceased bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev, an ethnic Chechen, visited Russia last year…. Putin accused the West of providing ‚informational, financial, and political‘ support to militants in the North Caucasus that Russia considers terrorists. ‚Russia itself has been a victim of international terrorism, one of the first such victims,‘ he said. ‚And I have always been annoyed when our Western partners and your colleagues from the Western media called our terrorists — who committed brutal, bloody, sickening crimes on the territory of our country — called them insurgents and almost never called them terrorists,‘ Putin said.“
Putin Talks About Boston Bombings, Navalny, Berezovsky In Q&A Session
Radio Free Europe, 27 April 2013

Grozny2.jpg (22596 bytes)

Above, A Devastated Grozny In Chechnya During The Civil War That Followed The Fall Of The Berlin Wall And The End Of The Soviet Union

In April 2013 a young man of Chechen origin was arrested following the explosion of two bombs near the finish line of the Boston marathon in the United States, killing three people and wounding nearly 180.  For the first time the incident caused the American public to become strongly aware of Chechnya as source of international Islamist based terrorism.

What most Americans remained unaware of, however, was the long term secret support by NATO member states for Chechen terrorists (‚rebels‘), as part of the west’s struggle with Russia for control of pipeline corridors transporting oil and gas out of the Caspian sea region following the dissolution of the Soviet Union at the end of 1991.

The type of terror that occurred in Boston on 15 April 2013 has been, at various times during their civil war, a near daily experience for those who live in Chechnya. It is an experience whose delivery has been assisted by the hidden hand of NATO, the most lethal and hypocritical military alliance of modern times.

„Delivering one of his most scathing attacks on the US, Mr Gorbachev told The Daily Telegraph that a US military build-up was under way to contain a resurgent Russia. From Nato’s expansion plans in the former Soviet Union to Washington’s proposals for a bigger defence budget and a missile shield in central Europe, the US was deliberately quashing hopes for permanent peace with Russia, Mr Gorbachev said. ‚We had 10 years after the Cold War to build a new world order and yet we squandered them,‘ he said….. ‚I sometimes have a feeling that the United States is going to wage war against the entire world.‘... Relations have further deteriorated after Nato promised eventual membership to Georgia and Ukraine, a move interpreted by Mr Gorbachev as an attempt to extend America’s sphere of influence into Russia’s backyard.  ‘The Americans promised that Nato wouldn’t move beyond the boundaries of Germany after the Cold War but now half of central and eastern Europe are members, so what happened to their promises? It shows they cannot be trusted.’ ….Gorbachev ….. quoting a Russian documentary on state television, suggested that Margaret Thatcher had supplied weapons to Chechen terrorists.
Gorbachev: US could start new Cold War
Daily Telegraph, 7 May 2008

Oil is never far from the surface of the war in Chechnya…. oil financed the Chechen struggle for independence 10 years ago
the Caspian Sea oilfields and control of pipelines through the Caucasus were a major factor behind Moscow’s use of force against the [Chechen] rebels.“
Back garden ‚oil barons‘ spring up in Chechnya
Daily Telegraph, 7 June 2002

NATO’s Decades Long Islamic Jihad

Bombings at a marathon sporting event in Boston, Massachusetts, in the spring of 2013 suddenly drew much public focus onto the role of Chechnya as a centre for Islamist terrorism. This is a subject to which very little public attention had previously been drawn despite the fact that at least eleven of the 9/11 al-Qaeda hijackers travelled to Chechnya between 1996 and 2000. However, militant Islamists in Chechnya have not been acting alone.

During the 1990s NATO countries had been working behind the scenes to try and destabilise Chechnya by secretly backing militant jihadists seeking independence from Russia after the fall of the Berlin Wall.

Chechnya falls within the key geopolitical strategic corridor known as ‚the Caucasus‘ linking the oil and gas fields of the Caspian Sea region with Western Europe. NATO believes that if Chechnya can be split off from Russia, western control of the corridor will be greatly enhanced.

NATO’s secret alliance with jihadist Islam in Chechnya is an extension of that launched in 1979 in Afghanistan by US President Jimmy Carter, and later extended under the Reagan Administration. Running to billions of dollars it was NATO’s largest ever covert operation (‚Operation Cyclone‘) and it propelled the rise Osama Bin Laden.

This covert policy of backing militant Islamists in pursuit of ‚regime change‘ was also continued by NATO member states in the Balkans and in Libya in the 1990s, and against Libya, Syria and Iran after 9/11.

Those post 9/11 activities have been in total contradiction to the so-called ‚war on terror‘ proclaimed by the Bush II administration, albeit a proclamation long since understood as a ’smokescreen‘ for the pursuit of other geopolitical objectives (see ‚This War On Terrorism Is Bogus‘, Guardian 6 September 2003), not least of which was ‚regime change‘ in Iraq in 2003, the planning for which began just 10 days into the Bush administration in January 2001.

With the principal exception of actions against the Shia-Islam-based religious regime in Iran, all these covert operations have involved NATO member states deploying fundamentalist Islamists to try and overthrow secular governments (Najibulla in Afghanistan; Milosevic in Yugoslavia; Putin in Chechnya; Gaddafi in Libya; and Assad in Syria). The aim of the Islamists in all these cases is not to establish democracy, but rather rule by Islamic Sharia law, as was achieved by the Taleban in Afghanistan after NATO’s covert destabilisation of that country in the 1980s.

In the case of Iran the United States has been secretly backing the MEK (or ‚People’s Mujahadeen of Iran‘, a Marxist Islamist group), some of whom were covertly trained by the US government in America’s Nevada desert between 2005 and 2007. This matter was exposed in 2012 by the veteran Pulitzer Prize winning investigative journalist, Seymour Hersh, the man who had also previously exposed the My Lai massacre during the Vietnam war, and the Abu Ghraib prison torture scandal following the US led invasion of Iraq in 2003.

The Bush administration’s covert training of the MEK, as uncovered by Hersh, took place even though the organisation was officially designated a terrorist group at the time by the US State Department.

The Obama administration has since delisted the MEK as a terrorist group in order to more easily further its efforts to destabilise Iran, as happened with the Bin Laden-allied KLA in Yugoslavia under the Clinton administration in the 1990s. Put simply, such people are designated ‚terrorists‘ when attacking NATO member states, but ‚rebels‘ or ‚freedom fighters‘ when attacking NATO’s enemies, for which they are deployed on a vastly larger scale.

In the eyes of western strategists, it is that latter imbalance which makes the overall net effect of the exercise geopolticially ‚worthwhile‘, despite occasional ‚blow back‘ causalities on the soil of NATO member states.

This is part of a cynical calculation of the type infamously outlined by former US National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski in an interview given with the diplomatic journal Le Nouvel Observateur as far back as 1998, when he described the creation of what he called „Some stirred-up Muslims“ as a price worth paying for conducting covert operations against the Russians in Afghanistan in the 1980s (though  Brzezinski’s post 9/11 opposition to the arming of Islamists in Syria suggests a more recent tacit acknowledgement of the dangerous consequences of such actions).

The ultimate targets in these covert wars are Russia (the world’s largest combined producer of oil and gas) and China (the world’s largest consumer of energy), including their strategic interests abroad. Neither being any longer communist in economic terms, these two countries are now major capitalist competitors to NATO member states.

NATO’s ‚Islamic Jihad‘ conducted against them is not about ‚values‘, but about money and the natural resources which underpin it.

In the process millions of innocent people continue to have their lives devastated by being killed, maimed, orphaned, or made homeless and destitute.


„We’re trying to move these newly independent countries toward the west. We would like to see them reliant on western commercial and political interests rather than going another way. We’ve made a substantial political investment in the Caspian, and it’s very important to us that both the pipeline map and the politics come out right.
Bill Richardson 1998,
Bill Clinton’s US energy secretary, on US policy on the extraction and transport of Caspian oil
‚A discreet deal in the pipeline – Nato mocked those who claimed there was a plan for Caspian oil‘
Guardian, 15 February 2001

The West’s Secret Alliance With Islamic Jihadists In The Balkans And The Caucasus

„The Clinton administration followed up by providing strong support to the KLA, even though it was known that the KLA supported the Muslim mujahadeen. Despite that knowledge, then Secretary of State Madeleine Albright had the KLA removed from the State Department list of terrorists. This action paved the way for the United States to provide the KLA with needed logistical support. At the same time, the KLA also received support from Iran and Usama bin Laden, along with ‚Islamic holy warriors‘ who were jihad veterans from Bosnia, Chechnya and Afghanistan. Swiss journalist Richard Labeviere, in his book, ‚Dollars for Terror,‘ said that the international Islamic networks linked to bin Laden received help from U.S. intelligence community. Indeed, Chechen sources claim that U.S. intelligence also aided them in their opposition to Russia. Given that U.S. policy in the post-Cold War period has not only been anti-Russian but anti-Iranian, the United States worked closely with Pakistan’s predominantly Sunni Inter-Services Intelligence organization. Through ISI, the United States recruited Sunni mujahadeen by staging them in Chechnya to fight in Bosnia and later in Kosovo.“
Michael Maloof, Post 9/11 Pentagon Counterterrorism Adviser
Iran subversion in Balkans
G2 Bulletin, 25 September 2006

(Who is Michael Maloof? – Click Here)


NATO’s Covert Islamist Uprising In Chechnya
The Key Role Of Turkey

Why Is NATO Backing Chechen Independence?
‚It’s The Pipeline Corridors Stupid‘

Transatlantic Covert Operations
In Chechnya

Chechnya And The Role Of Abu Qatada
The Al Qaeda Leader The British Authorities Refused To Put On Trial In The UK

Dirty Oil Games In The Caucasus
The Role Of NATO’s Covert Operations In The Ukrainian Elections Of 2004

Additional News Updates
Since The Ukrainian Elections Of 2004

‚Plausible Deniability‘

„I can tell you that there is a role in my mind, a proper role, for covert action to continue. And I would not call it ‚paramilitary‘. I would call it ‚pure covert action‘. And that would be things happening to the benefit of national security that just seem to happen. And there is not an American flag on them. And if somebody came to the President of the United States, he would be able to say, ‚I don’t know what you’re talking about.‘
Porter Goss, former director of the CIA
Ship of Spies
BBC Radio 4, 15 January 2011

NATO’s Islamist Uprising In Chechnya
The Key Role Of Turkey

„President Putin has drawn a line in the mountains of the North Caucasus beyond which Russia will not withdraw…. Mr Putin has also added into this complex mix the spectre of international (by which he means Islamic) terrorism and an accusation that unnamed foreign countries want to break bits off Russia…. An oil pipeline from Azerbaijan used to run through Chechnya, but it was by-passed after earlier fighting and now goes through Dagestan. There is oil and gas to be developed in the Caspian Sea and Russia wants a stable area through which to pass supplies.
Chechnya: Why Putin is implacable
BBC Online, 6 September 2004

The controversial Kremlin-backed president of Chechnya claims that militants in the violence-plagued Russian province are backed by U.S. and British intelligence agencies. Ramzan Kadyrov’s remark was probably the bluntest claim by a Russian official that insurgents in the restive North Caucasus have Western support. Western officials have dismissed such assertions as nonsense. A statement from Kadyrov’s office Wednesday quoted him as suggesting that Western-backed mercenaries are fighting the government in Chechnya. It quotes him as saying, ‚We are fighting in the mountains with the American and English special services.‘ Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin suggested during his presidency that the West was encouraging unrest in the North Caucasus.“
Chechen Leader Claims US, Britain Back Rebels
Associated Press, 23 September 2009

Pakistan And Saudi Arabia Provided The Mujahadeen (As In The Previous War With The Soviets In Afghanistan)
Whilst Turkey Also Provided The Logistics


At least 11 of the 9/11 al-Qaeda hijackers travelled to Chechnya between 1996 and 2000.“
Chechen rebels were feared for suicidal courage and cruelty
London Times, 20 April 2013, Print Edition, P 9

„… evidence of the U.S.’ unwillingness to crack down on Chechen extremism came in the form of one of the most high-profile U.S. law enforcement successes in the days leading up to 9/11: the capture of Zacarias Moussaoui in Minnesota on August 16, 2001. Whistleblower Coleen Rowley wrote recently that not only did her former employers at the FBI, CIA Director George Tenet, and other counterterrorism experts balk at allowing a search of Moussaoui’s laptop and other property but, more disturbingly, they brushed aside a critical April 2001 memo by erstwhile FBI Assistant Director Dale Watson. That memo, entitled ‚Bin Laden/Ibn Khattab Threat Reporting,‘ warned about ’significant and urgent‘ intelligence to suggest ’serious operational planning‘ for terrorism attacks by ‚Sunni extremists with links to Ibn al Khattab, an extremist leader in Chechnya, and to Usama Bin Laden,‘ reported the New York Times’ Philip Shenon in his insightful 2011 story of ‚The Terrible Missed Chance‘ Even after the FBI’s attaché in Paris reported that French spy agencies had evidence suggesting Moussaoui was a recruiter for Khattab and despite senior intelligence officials admitting that ‚the system was blinking red‘ with the prospect of an imminent terror attack, no one seemed to want to acknowledge that Moussaoui, Khattab and bin Laden were brothers in bloodshed.“
America’s politics of convenience
The Hindu, 3 May 2013

[Bin Laden] is …. suspected of helping to set up Islamic training centres to prepare soldiers to fight in Chechnya and other parts of the former Soviet Union…. Born in Saudi Arabia to a Yemeni family, Bin Laden left Saudi Arabia in 1979 to fight against the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. The Afghan jihad was backed with American dollars and had the blessing of the governments of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. He received security training from the CIA itself, according to Middle Eastern analyst Hazhir Teimourian. While in Afghanistan, he founded the Maktab al-Khidimat (MAK), which recruited fighters from around the world and imported equipment to aid the Afghan resistance against the Soviet army.“
Who is Osama Bin Laden?
BBC Online, 18 September 2001

„… these [intercepted] conversations, between 1997 and 2001, had to do with a Central Asia operation that involved bin Laden. Not once did anybody use the word ‚al-Qaeda.‘ It was always ‚mujahideen,‘ always ‚bin Laden‘ and, in fact, not ‚bin Laden‘ but ‚bin Ladens‘ plural. There were several bin Ladens who were going on private jets to Azerbaijan and Tajikistan. The Turkish ambassador in Azerbaijan worked with them. There were bin Ladens, with the help of Pakistanis or Saudis, under our management…. bringing people from East Turkestan into Kyrgyzstan, from Kyrgyzstan to Azerbaijan, from Azerbaijan some of them were being channeled to Chechnya, some of them were being channeled to Bosnia. From Turkey, they were putting all these bin Ladens on NATO planes. People and weapons went one way, drugs came back…. A lot of the drugs were going to Belgium with NATO planes. After that, they went to the UK, and a lot came to the U.S. via military planes to distribution centers in Chicago and Paterson, New Jersey. Turkish diplomats who would never be searched were coming with suitcases of heroin.“
Sibel Edmonds, former Turkish translator at the FBI on the intercepts she discovered

Who’s Afraid of Sibel Edmonds?
The American Conservative, November 2009

„The Clinton administration followed up by providing strong support to the KLA, even though it was known that the KLA supported the Muslim mujahadeen. Despite that knowledge, then Secretary of State Madeleine Albright had the KLA removed from the State Department list of terrorists. This action paved the way for the United States to provide the KLA with needed logistical support. At the same time, the KLA also received support from Iran and Usama bin Laden, along with ‚Islamic holy warriors‘ who were jihad veterans from Bosnia, Chechnya and Afghanistan. Swiss journalist Richard Labeviere, in his book, ‚Dollars for Terror,‘ said that the international Islamic networks linked to bin Laden received help from U.S. intelligence community. Indeed, Chechen sources claim that U.S. intelligence also aided them in their opposition to Russia. Given that U.S. policy in the post-Cold War period has not only been anti-Russian but anti-Iranian, the United States worked closely with Pakistan’s predominantly Sunni Inter-Services Intelligence organization. Through ISI, the United States recruited Sunni mujahadeen by staging them in Chechnya to fight in Bosnia and later in Kosovo.“
Michael Maloof, Post 9/11 Pentagon Counterterrorism Adviser
Iran subversion in Balkans
G2 Bulletin, 25 September 2006

(Who is Michael Maloof? – Click Here)

And On Into The Balkans

„[Bosnian Muslim leader] Izetbegovic travels to Pakistan to rally Muslim support for Bosnia….Izetbegovic, in Pakistan, appeals for aid from world’s Muslims…. the first three countries Izetbegovic visited after being inaugurated as president were Libya, Iran and Turkey. During a trip to Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey in July 1991, he conveyed the impression that he was looking to conclude an Islamic alliance… From June 1992 so-called mujahedin or ‘holy warriors’ from Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Algeria, Turkey, Bahrein and Qatar fought on the Muslim side in the war in Bosnia. There were only a few hundred of them fighting in the war but, more importantly, their involvement had the blessing of Izetbegovic… the supply of weapons from particularly Pakistan and Iran to Bosnia was not by sea, but mainly by air….. The so-called Air Operations Coordination Center in Sarajevo was manned by personnel from NATO…. Requests for Close Air Support …..went to the Operational section … in Tuzla. This section consisted almost entirely of Pakistanis…. the officer in charge of operations (the G-3) of Sector North East, [was] the Pakistani Lieutenant-Colonel Rachid Sadiki… As Sarajevo was very much aware of its dependence on Croatia, Izetbegovic visited Teheran again on 14 September 1993 to deepen the defence relationship…. eanwhile Holbrooke was becoming increasingly frustrated that the [illegal arms] Croatian pipeline [to Bosnia] was not progressing well. …. Holbrooke therefore proposed to deliver arms and ammunition to the ABiH [Bosnian Muslim army] via third party countries. Lake, who had always welcomed such covert operations, nonetheless found the plan ‚too risky‘. The Secretary of State, Christopher, shared this view. They did support ‘lift and strike’ but not ‘lift, arm and strike’. Holbrooke’s proposals did lead to a debate within the administration. Clinton and State Department officials considered supplies via Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan. This was not new: in the 1980s, Saudi Arabia had already supplied arms worth $ 500 million via the CIA to the Mujahedin fighters in Afghanistan….. A number of countries are candidates for having supplied directly to Bosnia. Pakistan delivered equipment, as did the Sultan of Brunei, who paid for anti-tank missiles from Malaysia. In January 1993 already, a Pakistani vessel with ten containers of arms, which were destined for the ABiH, was intercepted in the Adriatic Sea. Pakistan definitely defied the United Nations ban on supply of arms to the Bosnian Muslims and sophisticated anti-tank guided missiles were air lifted by the Pakistani intelligence agency, ISI, to help Bosnians fight the Serbs, an ex-ISI Chief has officially admitted in a written petition submitted before a court in Lahore. The document was submitted by Lt. General (Retd) Javed Nasir, who was head of the ISI from March 1992 to May 1993, in a case he filed against the owner and editors of the largest newspaper and TV group of Pakistan, in an anti Terrorism Court. It remains unclear how the missiles were transported to Bosnia and who did it…. As early as 1992 Iran had opened a smuggling route to Bosnia with the assistance of Turkey; this was two years before the Clinton administration gave ‚permission‘ for creating the [illegal arms] Croatian pipeline. Bosnian government officials acknowledged that in 1993 a Turkish pipeline also existed, through which the above-mentioned arms from Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Brunei and Pakistan were smuggled….. NATO officers stated in a British daily newspaper that if the American intelligence services used a cover, ‚Turkey would be the obvious choice‘. The Turkish air force had C-130s that could reach Tuzla. This was otherwise also true of the Iranian and Pakistani air forces, which were also mentioned as possible third-party countries for supplies via Turkey to Tuzla. The UK Defence Intelligence Staff (DIS) was also aware of the American secret arms supplies to the ABiH. According to a British intelligence official, the DIS never made an issue of them, so as not to further damage the sensitive relationship with the US services. An internal DIS analysis concluded that the arms were delivered via ‚a different network‘, and that the entire operation was probably led by the NSC [the US President’s National Security Council]. It was stressed that the CIA and DIA were not involved in the Black Flights to Tuzla. Incidentally, the DIS received a direct order from the British government not to investigate this affair. This was not permitted for the simple reason that the matter was too sensitive in the framework of American-British relations…. The Pentagon had likewise identified Cengic as the main link between the supplies from Islamic countries, such as Iran, Turkey and Pakistan…. The conclusion must be that the United States ‚turned a blind eye‘ to the Croatian pipeline, but in the case of the Black Flights to Tuzla Air Base, they deliberately closed their ‚eyes‘ (of the AWAC aircraft) for the direct Turkish flights. US aircraft did not themselves fly to Tuzla, because their discovery would have seriously embarrassed the US government and put transatlantic relations under even greater pressure. Supplies via a third party country were a simpler solution for the United States.“
Srebrenica – A Safe Area?
Report Published on Behalf of The Dutch Government, 10 April 2002

And Central Asia

A memoir by a top former Turkish intelligence official claims that a worldwide moderate Islamic movement based in Pennsylvania has been providing cover for the CIA since the mid-1990s. The memoir, roughly rendered in English as ‚Witness to Revolution and Near Anarchy,‘ by retired Turkish intelligence official Osman Nuri Gundes, says the religious-tolerance movement, led by an influential former Turkish imam by the name of Fethullah Gulen, has 600 schools and 4 million followers around the world. In the 1990s, Gundes alleges, the movement ’sheltered 130 CIA agents‘ at its schools in Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan alone, according to a report on his memoir Wednesday by the Paris-based Intelligence Online newsletter. The book has caused a sensation in Turkey since it was published last month.“
Islamic group is CIA front, ex-Turkish intel chief says
Jeff Stein – Spy Talk – Washington Post, 5 January 2011


CaucasusMap.gif (17180 bytes)

„The Caucasus is among the most vital regions of the world for the United States, said Commander of the United States European Command James Jones….. At the hearings in the U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services on March 1 General Jones presented an analytical report on the current and future military strategic interests of the United States in the world. ‚Caucasus is increasingly important for our interests,‘ he said. This region is a key one in the process of spreading democracy and market economy to the countries of Central and Southeast Asia, Mr. Johns said. In the coming five years Caspian oil running across the Caucasus may account for 25% of the world increase in oil production, he said. It has been estimated by the U.S. military that the Caucasian oil and gas will ensure a diversification of the energy sources for Europe, the general said, according to a RIA Novosti report.“
U.S. Commander-in-Chief in Europe: Caucasus is vital for U.S.
Pravda, 4 March 2005

CaucasusNorth.gif (17102 bytes)


Kategorien:Geo Politik