Archiv

Archive for Januar 2014

Höchste US und Britische Generäle, lauter korrupte und kriminelle Verbrecher Welt weit unterwegs

Januar 12, 2014 5 Kommentare

Seit Jahren bekannt, diese US Verbrecher Bande, durch prominente eigene Generäle, als reine Terroristen und Verbrecher Gruppe, weltweit unterwegs

Amerikansiche Truppe, schiessen auf eingesperte Gefangene im Irak: In der PR der NATO, nennt man es Humanitäre Kriege und Demokratie bringen und Steinmeier macht da besonders eifrig mit.

Über die Verbrecher Bande und deren Verbrechen, ein Prominenter US General

 Ex-”Delta Force – Navy Seal” General Hugh Shelton outet die Verbrechen der Bush Regierung

 

In den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika findet diese Strategie des unkontrollierbaren Tötens ihren vorläufigen Höhepunkt mit den Visionen des Chefs des U.S.S.O.C.O.M., Admiral McRaven (Vortrag vom Frühjahr 2013 am Woodrow Wilson Center “U.S. Special Operations 2020″). Dieser Mann ist, wenn ihm nicht durch die eigene Regierung Einhalt geboten wird, im Prinzip der mächtigste Kriegsfürst auf diesem Planeten.

Dem mit der C.I.A. eng verbandelten Admiral wird in Kürze alles ohne Rechenschaftspflicht wegen der Geheimhaltung im Rahmen der nationalen Sicherheit zur Verfügung stehen: Geld ohne Ende, die Elite der Elite der eigenen sowie ausländischer Spezialeinsatzkommandos (auch deutscher), ein Strom von Informationen von internationalen detaillierten Daten über fast jeden Ort und Bürger dieses Planeten durch befreundete Geheimdienste, die neuesten Errungenschaften militärischer Techniken, Einbindung des Heimatschutzministeriums, staatlicher und nichtstaatlicher Behörden und vieles mehr. Für die Bewilligung des dazu benötigten Kapitals sorgen die Profiteure im U.S.-Senat und Kongress.

Eine Kontrolle ist so gut wie unmöglich, da alle Aktivitäten und Informationen als “Top secret” eingestuft sind. Dem Präsidenten können zur “legalen” Absegnung der Einsätze Märchen serviert werden oder laufen ohne jegliches Wissen darüber im Geheimen ab. Mit der aktuellen abgeschirmten Konstellation ist eine Einsichtnahme so gut wie ausgeschlossen.

William McRaven (Autor des 1995 erschienenen Buches “Spec Ops: Case Studies in Special Operations Warfare, Theory and Practice” mit Analysen von acht Einsätzen von Sonderkommandos seit dem Zweiten Weltkrieg) ist das vorläufig letzte Glied in dieser Entwicklung. Zuvor standen dem Admiral drei seiner engsten Verbündeten, Vertrauten und Freunde zur Seite: General David Petraeus (Ex-C.E.N.T.C.O.M.-Chef), General Stanley McChrystal und Vizeadmiral Robert Harward (Ex-Vize-Kommandeur C.E.N.T.C.O.M.).

Robert Harward wurde am 23. Oktober 2013 von seinem Posten entfernt (militärische Laufbahn).

David Petraeus, der nach seiner militärischen Umsetzung zum C.I.A.-Boss ernannt wurde, trat im vergangenen Jahr wegen einer angeblichen Affäre zurück.

Stanley McChyristal reichte seinen Rücktritt wegen unflätiger Ausdrücke über Beamte und den U.S.-Präsidenten anstandshalber von allein ein, um nicht unehrenhaft aus dem Dienst entlassen zu werden. Vorbereitet wurde dieser Deal anscheinend mit der Reportage im “Rolling Stone” von Michael Hastings. Der Autor kam in diesem Jahr am 18. Juni ums Leben: ein Autounfall, bei dem der Wagen völlig ausbrannte.

http://www.radio-utopie.de/2013/11/17/admiral-william-mcraven-der-letzte-der-viererbande/

Als Teil des United States Special Operations Command (U.S.S.O.C.O.M.) – dessen Hauptquartier auf der MacDill Air Force Base in Florida zur Kommandozentrale von William McRaven (Admiral William McRaven: der Letzte der Viererbande, Artikel vom 17. November 2013) ausgebaut wird – gehört A.F.S.O.A.W.C. zu einem Imperium, bei dem der militärische Teil nur der ausführende Arm von Kräften ist, die in dem Artikel Das Doomsday-Projekt und Tiefenereignisse: JFK, Watergate, Iran-Contra und 9/11 von Peter Dale Scott ausführlich beschrieben sind. Das Militär in Texas und Florida, einschliesslich des McDill-Luftwaffenstützpunktes, gehörte bis heute zu den erzreaktionärsten Kräften der U.S.-Armee und ist eng verflochten mit den geheimen Zirkeln in Politik und Wirtschaft.

Vor zwei Tagen, am 9. Januar 2014 veröffentlichte Nick Turse einem ausführlichen Bericht auf TomDispatch über diese geheime “Schattenarmee in der Armee” William McRaven’s unter dem Titel “America’s Black-Ops Blackout – Unraveling the Secrets of the Military’s Secret Military”, in dem anschaulich in dieser Grafik das erschreckende Ausmass der Operationen ohne jegliche parlamentarische Kontrolle dargestellt wird.

Dort heisst es, dass mindestens 11500 spezielle Sondereinsatzkräfte im Jahr 2013 in verschiedenen Missionen weltweit operiert haben, ein Teil davon – soweit zugänglich aus öffentlichen Quellen – wurde dort zusammengestellt, einschliesslich geheimer Aktivitäten im Jemen mit permanenter Anwesenheit im Office of Civilian-Military Cooperation der zivilen Auslandshilfe U.S. AID und im Libanon (SOC FWD Lebanon).

Mit dem Netzwerk Trans Regional Web Initiative werden zehn Propaganda-Websites betrieben wie KhabarSouthAsia.com für Südasien, Magharebia für Nordafrika, für den Mittleren Osten Al-Shorfa.com oder für Latein Amerika Infosurhoy.com.

Desweiteren wurden unter der Überschrift “Bringing the War Home” die Pläne des U.S.S.O.C.O.M. benannt, in diesem Jahr das “SOCNORTH 2014″ in den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika zum Schutz der eigenen Bevölkerung einzurichten, wenn diese “in Zeiten grosser Bedrohung am dringensten Hilfe benötigt. SOCNORTH wird die Verantwortung für die U.S.A., Kanada, Mexiko und Teile der Karibik übernehmen”. (Anm.: Die Aufstandsbekämpfung – auch im Inland mit Hilfe sämtlicher staatlichen Behörden – ist einer der von William McRaven gesetzten Schwerpunkte.)

Dies ist nur ein kleiner Auszug aus dem Artikel, weitere umfangreiche Informationen unter der Quellenangabe.

Artikel zum Thema

Joint Operations Center des S.O.C.O.M. für U.S.-Elitetruppen in Belize
Isoliertes Kampf- und Spionagezentrum mit Anspruch auf sämtliche Informationen und Kapazitäten des Landes (analog unserer neuen Gefahrenabwehrzentren) – Belize verfügt über erstes, durch U.S.-Elitetrainer ausgebildetes SEALs Team 001

 

Die Britten identisch:

 

SAS Terrroristen in Basar durch Zufall gestellt und kurz gefangen genommen, bis die Britten mit der Bombardierung der Polizei Station drohten.

Just before the team were about to end the surveillance mission, they were confronted by several plains-clothes Iraqi policemen. A gunfight ensued during which at least one Iraqi policeman was wounded.The SAS men tried to reach an emergency rendezvous point (ERV) but were stopped by uniformed Police who were investigating the gunfire. The SAS chose to surrender at this point. They identified themselves as British military and they were taken into custody.

capture undercover british operatives

Photo released to the media showing the 2 captured British soldiers and their weapons.captured sas weapons

Kein Interesse an Verhandlungen

Mi6: British SAS Terror Operation: Balkan, Irak, Pakistan, Libyen
Leadership in Terror Operations and Terror: Mi6 – SAS worldwhite  Teacher for the Islam terrorist

21.4.2011: Die Ratten des Britischen Mi6 : unter welchem Namen die Gestalten operieren

Direkte Partenr von Joschka Fischer, welche 2001 eine Diploatische Immunittä in Deutschland erhielten, als MPRI.com, obwohl deren Verbrecher im Balkan bereist bekannt waren, für den Waffen Schmugel an Terroristen. Später aufgekauft von Blackwater, welche nur Mordete überall.

Identich im Kosovo, Bosnien, Albanien: Immer als Schutz Herr von Mördern, Verbrechern und Terroristen unterwegs: Die USA und Britten vor allem.

 Troops free SAS men free from jail

British soldier escapes burning Warrior

 

Blckwater Verbrecher, von der Bevölkerung in die Luft gesprengt im Irak.

Strafanzeige wegen Kriegsverbrechen
Briten sollen im Irak systematisch gefoltert haben

Menschenrechtler haben 85 Fälle von Folter und Misshandlung dokumentiert. Der Internationale Strafgerichtshof soll ermitteln. mehr

Kategorien:NATO - Gladio

1971: Einbruch von Vietnamkriegsgegnern beim FBI enthüllte den Überwachungsstaat


 
Vier Jahrzehnte vor Snowden: „The Citizens Commission to Investigate the FBI“

Markus Kompa 08.01.2014

Einbruch von Vietnamkriegsgegnern beim FBI enthüllte den Überwachungsstaat

Am 8.März 1971 brachen Unbekannte in ein FBI-Gebäude in Philadelphia ein und stahlen nicht etwa Wertsachen, sondern Tausende Akten. Das Material landete bei der Washington Post, welche die Nation über die massive Überwachung der eigenen Bevölkerung informierte. So hatte das FBI die Bürgerrechts- und Friedensbewegung mit geheimdienstlichen Methoden nicht nur ausspioniert, sondern betrieb sogar ein systematisches Programm mit Maßnahmen zur Infiltrierung und Zersetzung entsprechender Gruppierungen. Fast 43 Jahre nach dem geheimnisvollen Einbruch enthüllten noch lebende Aktivisten nunmehr ihre Identität.

Ende der 1960er Jahre waren viele US-Bürgerrechtler, die vergeblich gegen den Vietnamkrieg und gegen Rassismus protestiert hatten, von der Effektlosigkeit ihrer Demonstrationen und Petitionen frustriert. Etliche spürten auch die systematische Überwachung der Friedensbewegung durch das FBI – darunter der Harvard-Kernphysiker Prof. Dr. William Davidon. Davidon war ein bekannter Friedensaktivist, dessen Warnung vor der Wasserstoffbombe 1959 sogar Chruschtschow zitiert hatte. Vor dem Vietnamkrieg hatte Davidon in Fort Dix in einem Kaffeehaus mit Truppen diskutiert und wurde 1965 festgenommen, weil er in der Nähe von Rüstungsbetrieben Flugblätter verteilt hatte.

Um Beweise für die systematische Überwachung von Friedensaktivisten zu sichern, schlug Davidon sieben Mitstreitern vor, in ein Gebäude der Bundespolizei Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) einzubrechen. Einige der Aktivisten waren bereits zuvor in Philadelphia dazu übergegangen, in Büros der Wehrdienstverwaltung einzudringen und Einberufungsakten zu zerstören. Zur Vorbereitung des Coups observierte die selbst ernannte „Bürgerkommission zur Untersuchung des FBI“ das Gebäude und seine Besucher zunächst von außen. Die Studentin Bonnie Raines betrat das Bauwerk unter dem Vorwand, sie interessiere sich für eine Stelle beim FBI, um auf diese Weise die Räumlichkeiten auszuspionieren. Dabei fiel ihr auf, dass es keinerlei Alarmanlagen oder Wachen gab, dafür aber eine ungesicherte Hintertür. Während dieser Phase achtete die Gruppe darauf, ihr sonstiges Engagement nicht zu vernachlässigen, um keine durch Verhaltensänderung erkennbare Spuren zu verursachen.

FBI-Phantombild der damals unbekannten Bonnie Raines.

Als Termin wählten die Verschwörer den „Kampf des Jahrhunderts“ zwischen den legendären Boxern Muhammad Ali und Joe Frazier, der die Kapazitäten der nun einmal boxinteressierten Cops und anderer Passanten binden würde. Die Einbrecher tarnten sich mit seriöser Businesskleidung und Aktenkoffern. Keith Forsyth hatte einen Fernkurs im Schlösserknacken besucht, nutzte an diesem Abend aber ein Brecheisen, mit dem er sofort zum Ziel kam. Die „Bürgerkommission“ sackte eilig alles ein, was interessant schien. Bonnies Ehemann John, der ebenfalls einmal bei einer Demonstration verhaftet worden war, steuerte das Fluchtauto zu einer Quäkerfarm, wo die Gruppe das Material sichtete…….

http://www.heise.de/tp/artikel/40/40713/1.html

TODAY

TODAY   |  January 07, 2014
Burglars from 1971 FBI break-in confess crime

In the bombshell book, “The Burglary,” journalist Betty Medzger exposes the robbers behind the momentous theft from an FBI office outside Philadelphia over 40 years ago. The perpetrators have come forward in an interview with NBC News.

Kategorien:Geo Politik

Die Russen spielten Katz und Maus in Nord Schottland mit einem Kriegs Schiff


Für die Nord Brittische Küste in Schottland, gab es nur noch 1 Kriegs Schiff, um das Russische Navy Schiff, abzuschrecken. Die Britten wurden extrem nervös, und die Russen lachten sich tod, über soviel Dummheit, mit ihren Weltweiten sinnlosen und teuren Operationen.

Battle stations! Navy scrambles destroyer to challenge Russian warship off British coast (but it takes 24 hours to make 600-mile journey from Portsmouth base – was Putin testing our response time?)

Russian vessel detected 30 miles away from Scotland last night
Only ship available to respond was on south coast of England
Tensions heightened when aerial photos showed ship full of missiles

By Mark Nicol

PUBLISHED: 22:02 GMT, 4 January 2014 | UPDATED: 14:47 GMT, 5 January 2014

HMS Defender

A Russian cruiser came within 30 miles of the British coast but the Navy only had one ship to respond (file image)A Russian cruiser came within 30 miles of the British coast but the Navy only had one ship to respond (file image)

 

A fully armed Royal Navy warship was scrambled to challenge a missile-carrying Russian vessel  in the waters off Britain just days before Christmas, defence sources revealed last night.

In a calculated test of Britain’s reduced naval capacity in the North Sea, the Russian warship came within 30 miles of the coast.

It was detected nearing Scotland, but the only ship the Royal Navy had available to respond after Ministry of Defence cuts was in Portsmouth, resulting in a delay of 24 hours until it was in position.

The threatening approach towards Britain’s territorial waters triggered a top-secret Navy and Air Force operation co-ordinated by the military top brass at the Permanent Joint Headquarters (PJHQ) bunker at Northwood, just outside London.

RAF reconnaissance aircraft tracked the progress of the Russian warship as it neared north-east Scotland, and the tension heightened when aerial photographs revealed the ship was carrying a full payload of guided missiles.

Commanders at PJHQ decided to send the new Type 45 destroyer HMS Defender, which is Britain’s immediate-response ship during a national security crisis.

The Russian ship waited in the Moray Forth, a stretch of water  that flows into Loch Ness, for Defender to arrive, as if her captain were recording the Navy’s response times.

At the time, Defender was in dock at Portsmouth. Her crew were forced to make the 600-mile journey around the coastline, because budget cutbacks mean there are no maritime patrol vessels sailing off Scotland.

A defence source said: ‘This was no exercise – the Russian ship was behaving very aggressively in a stretch of water bordering Britain’s territorial waters.

‘They were watched very closely by the RAF and it was agreed that HMS Defender should block the Russians’  passage.

A tense stand-off ensued when Defender reached the Moray Firth as crews tried to establish intentionsA tense stand-off ensued when Defender reached the Moray Firth as crews tried to establish intentions

 

‘Defender was fully equipped with Sea Viper surface-to-air missiles and guns capable of firing 40kg shells as far as 18 miles. Her captain and crew knew this was the real deal and were prepared to engage.’

A tense stand-off ensued when Defender reached the Moray Firth. While the MoD last night declined  to explain the specific international protocols adhered to at such a delicate moment, The Mail on Sunday understands the crews exchanged radio messages in an attempt to establish each other’s intentions.

 

No shots were fired but Defender’s 190-strong crew remained at battle stations throughout the confrontation.

The British crew then watched as the Russian ship retreated. They followed it north to the Baltic Sea, where a Russian task force was on legitimate manoeuvres. Defender then sailed back to Scotland, docking in Glasgow on Friday.

Last night, Russian expert Jonathan Eyal, from the military think-tank the Royal United Services Institute, said Russia had intended to intimidate Britain.

The 600-mile voyage

He added: ‘The Russian fleet, which is growing in strength  and expanding its sphere of influence, wanted to show a presence  in the North Sea and sail as close  as possible to the national sea boundary.

‘The Russians knew exactly what they were doing. They were saying, “We are back in business in the North Sea and we are powerful.”

‘They knew how far they could sail before they would be required to withdraw.

‘The Russians may also be inspecting nuclear installations in Scotland, with a view towards the independence referendum. Certainly the Russians would see the country as more vulnerable if it were no longer part of Britain.

‘The approach was part of a pattern of behaviour, and the action is more threatening when considered in this context.

‘Last year Russian military jets approached Swedish airspace and only withdrew when the Swedes scrambled their aircraft.’

After the confrontation between Defender and the Russian ship, which is believed to have begun  on December 20, the Russian military news agency Interfax-AVN released a statement claiming  that the vessel was sheltering in the Moray Firth because of adverse weather conditions.

This is the second such incident  in two years. In December 2011, the aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov, anti-submarine ship Admiral Chabanenko and escort ship Yaroslav Mudry sailed close to Scotland before being challenged by the Royal Navy.

Defender is the fifth of the Navy’s six state-of-the-art Type 45 destroyers – she was built in Glasgow, which is one of her two affiliated cities. The other is Exeter.

The MoD refused to comment last night for operational reasons.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2533846/Battle-stations-Navy-scrambles-destroyer-challenge-Russian-warship-British-coast-takes-24-hours-make-600-mile-journey-Portsmouth-base-Putin-testing-response-time.html#ixzz2pYga8A1k
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

Kategorien:Allgemein

US Kriegs Inzenierung der NATO: Terroristen auf dem Schachbrett

Januar 4, 2014 1 Kommentar

Terroristen auf dem Schachbrett

 

Von Peter Dale Scott | Veröffentlicht: 3. Januar 2014

Um dem Mysterium “9/11” auf die Spur zu kommen, ist es nicht verkehrt, dem Fall von zweien der angeblichen 19 Flugzeugentführer, Khalid Al-Midhar und Nawaf Al-Hazmi, Beachtung zu schenken. Hätte ein kleines, einzugrenzendes Element innerhalb der CIA die beiden Möchtegern-Terroristen nicht erfolgreich über 18 Monate hinweg vor einem Zugriff des FBI geschützt, wären sie wohl nie an Bord des Flugzeugs gewesen, das am 11. September 2001 Kurs aufs Pentagon nahm.

Von Peter Dale Scott, Übersetzung Lars Schall

Die Übersetzung des nachfolgende Essays, der im Original unter der Überschrift “Launching the U.S. Terror War: the CIA, 9/11, Afghanistan, and Central Asia“ hier auf The Asia-Pacific Journal erschien, wurde von Peter Dale Scott ausdrücklich und persönlich für LarsSchall.com autorisiert. Lesen Sie mehr »

In Artikelserien, Dokumentationen, Hintergrund und Analyse, Militär und Krieg, Spionage und Attentate veröffentlicht | Getaggt , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

74 Peter Dale Scott, “Bosnia, Kosovo, and Now Libya: The Human Costs of Washington’s On-Going Collusion with Terrorists,” Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, July 29, 2011, here. Evan Kohlmann has described how a Zagreb office in support of the Saudi-backed jihad in Bosnia received “all orders and funding directly from the main United States office of Al-Kifah on Atlantic Avenue controlled by Shaykh Omar Abdel Rahman” (Evan Kohlmann, Al-Qaida’s Jihad in Europe, 39-41; citing Steve Coll and Steve LeVine, “Global Network Provides Money, Haven,” Washington Post, August 3, 1993).

####

The pattern of U.S. collaboration with Muslim fundamentalists against more secular enemies is not new. It dates back to at least 1953, when the CIA recruited right-wing mullahs to overthrow Prime Minister Mossadeq in Iran, and also began to cooperate with the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood.3 But in Libya in 2011 we see a more complex marriage of convenience between US and al-Qaeda elements: one which repeats a pattern seen in Bosnia in 1992-95, and Kosovo in 1997-98. In those countries America responded to a local conflict in the name of a humanitarian intervention to restrain the side committing atrocities. But in all three cases both sides committed atrocities, and American intervention in fact favored the side allied with al-Qaeda.

The cause of intervention was fostered in all three cases by blatant manipulation and falsification of the facts. What a historian has noted of the Bosnian conflict was true also of Kosovo and is being echoed today in Libya: though attacks were “perpetrated by Serbs and Muslims alike,” the pattern in western media was “that killings of Muslims were newsworthy, while the deaths of non-Muslims were not.”4 Reports of mass rapes in the thousands proved to be wildly exaggerated: a French journalist “uncovered only four women willing to back up the story.”5 Meanwhile in 1994 the French intellectual Bernard-Henri Lévy (BHL) traveled to Bosnia and fervently endorsed the case for intervention in Bosnia; in 2011 February BHL traveled to Benghazi and reprised his interventionist role for Libya.6

…………….

New York Times map of May 15 with an interpretation of territorial division of Libya

The U.S.-al-Qaeda Alliance in Bosnia

Similarly, Clinton’s interventions in Bosnia and Kosovo were presented as humanitarian. But both sides had committed atrocities in those conflicts; Like the western media, Washington downplayed the Muslim atrocities because of its other interests.

Most Americans are aware that Clinton dispatched U.S. forces to Bosnia to enforce the Dayton peace accords after a well-publicized Serbian atrocity: the massacre of thousands of Muslims at Srebrenica. Thanks to a vigorous campaign by the p.r. firm Ruder Finn, Americans heard a great deal about the Srebrenica massacre, but far less about the beheadings and other atrocities by Muslims that preceded and helped account for it.

A major reason for the Serb attack on Srebrenica was to deal with the armed attacks mounted from that base on nearby villages: “intelligence sources said it was that harassment which precipitated the Serb attack on the 1,500 Muslim defenders inside the enclave.”27 General Philippe Morillon, commander of the UN troops in Bosnia from 1992 to 1993, testified to the ICTY (International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia) that Muslim forces based in Srebrenica had “engaged in attacks during Orthodox holidays and destroyed villages, massacring all the inhabitants. This created a degree of hatred that was quite extraordinary in the region”28 According to Prof. John Schindler,

Between May and December 1992, Muslim forces repeatedly attacked Serb villages around Srebrenica, killing and torturing civilians; some were mutilated and burned alive. Even pro-Sarajevo accounts concede that Muslim forces in Srebrenica…murdered over 1,300 Serbs…and had “ethnically cleansed a vast area.29

Former U.S. ambassador to Croatia Peter Galbraith later admitted in an interview that the U.S. administration was aware of “small numbers of atrocities” being committed by the foreign mujahedin in Bosnia, but dismissed the atrocities as “in the scheme of things not a big issue.”30

Other sources reveal that Washington gave a tacit green light to Croatia’s arming and augmentation of the Muslim presence in Srebrenica.31  Soon C-130 Hercules planes. some but not all of them Iranian, were dropping arms to the Muslims, in violation of the international arms embargo which the U.S. officially respected. More Arab-Afghan mujahedin arrived as well. Many of the airdrops and some of the mujahedin were at Tuzla, 70 kilometers from Srebrenica.32

According to The Spectator (London), the Pentagon was using other countries such as Turkey and Iran in this flow of arms and warriors:

From 1992 to 1995, the Pentagon assisted with the movement of thousands of Mujahideen and other Islamic elements from Central Asia into Europe, to fight alongside Bosnian Muslims against the Serbs. …. As part of the Dutch government’s inquiry into the Srebrenica massacre of July 1995, Professor Cees Wiebes of Amsterdam University compiled a report entitled ‘Intelligence and the War in Bosnia’, published in April 2002. In it he details the secret alliance between the Pentagon and radical Islamic groups from the Middle East, and their efforts to assist Bosnia’s Muslims. By 1993, there was a vast amount of weapons-smuggling through Croatia to the Muslims, organised by ‘clandestine agencies’ of the USA, Turkey and Iran, in association with a range of Islamic groups that included Afghan Mujahideen and the pro-Iranian Hezbollah. Arms bought by Iran and Turkey with the financial backing of Saudi Arabia were airlifted from the Middle East to Bosnia — airlifts with which, Wiebes points out, the USA was ‘very closely involved’.33

Cees Wiebes’ detailed account, based on years of research, documents both the case for American responsibility and the vigorous American denials of it:

At 17.45 on 10 February 1995, the Norwegian Captain Ivan Moldestad, a Norwegian helicopter detachment (NorAir) pilot, stood in the doorway of his temporary accommodation just outside Tuzla. It was dark, and suddenly he heard the sound of the propellers of an approaching transport aircraft; it was unmistakably a four engine Hercules C-130. Moldestad noticed that the Hercules was being escorted by two jet fighters, but could not tell their precise type in the darkness. There were other sightings of this secretive night-time flight to Tuzla Air Base (TAB). A sentry who was on guard duty outside the Norwegian medical UN unit in Tuzla also heard and saw the lights of the Hercules and the accompanying jet fighters. Other UN observers, making use of night vision equipment, also saw the cargo aircraft and the fighter planes concerned. The reports were immediately forwarded to the NATO Combined Air Operations Center (CAOC) in Vicenza and the UNPF Deny Flight Cell in Naples. When Moldestad phoned Vicenza, he was told that there was nothing in the air that night, and that he must be mistaken. When Moldestad persisted, the connection was broken.

The secretive C-130 cargo aircraft flights and night-time arms drops on Tuzla caused great agitation within UNPROFOR and the international community in February and March 1995. When asked, a British general responded with great certainty to the question of the origin of the secret supplies via TAB: ‘They were American arms deliveries. No doubt about that. And American private companies were involved in these deliveries.’ This was no surprising answer, because this general had access to intelligence gathered by a unit of the British Special Air Services (SAS) in Tuzla. The aircraft had come within range of this unit’s special night vision equipment, and the British saw them land.  It was a confirmation that a clandestine American operation had taken place in which arms, ammunition and military communication equipment were supplied to the ABiH. These night-time operations led to much consternation within the UN and NATO, and were the subject of countless speculations.34

Wiebes reports the possibility that the C-130s, some of which were said to have taken off from a US Air Force base in Germany, were actually controlled by Turkish authorities.35 But U.S. involvement was detected in the elaborate cover-up, from the fact that US AWACS aircraft, which should have provided a record of the secret flights, were either withdrawn from duty at the relevant times, or manned with US crews.36

A summary of Wiebes’ exhaustive report was published in the Guardian:

The Dutch report reveals how the Pentagon formed a secret alliance with Islamist groups in an Iran-Contra-style operation.

US, Turkish and Iranian intelligence groups worked with the Islamists in what the Dutch report calls the „Croatian pipeline“. Arms bought by Iran and Turkey and financed by Saudi Arabia were flown into Croatia initially by the official Iranian airline, Iran Air, and later in a fleet of black C-130 Hercules aircraft.

The report says that mojahedin fighters were also flown in, and that the US was „very closely involved“ in the operation which was in flagrant breach of the embargo. British secret services obtained documents proving that Iran also arranged deliveries of arms directly to Bosnia, it says.

The operation was promoted by the Pentagon, rather than the CIA, which was cautious about using Islamist groups as a conduit for arms, and about breaching the embargo. When the CIA tried to place its own people on the ground in Bosnia, the agents were threatened by the mojahedin fighters and the Iranians who were training them.

The UN relied on American intelligence to monitor the embargo, a dependency which allowed Washington to manipulate it at will.37

Meanwhile the Al-Kifah Center in Brooklyn, which in the 1980s had supported the “Arab-Afghans” fighting in Afghanistan, turned its attentions to Bosnia.

Al-Kifah’s English-language newsletter Al-Hussam (The Sword) also began publishing regular updates on jihad action in Bosnia….Under the control of the minions of Shaykh Omar Abdel Rahman, the newsletter aggressively incited sympathetic Muslims to join the jihad in Bosnia and Afghanistan themselves….The Al-Kifah Bosnian branch office in Zagreb, Croatia, housed in a modern, two-story building, was evidently in close communication with the organizational headquarters in New York. The deputy director of the Zagreb office, Hassan Hakim, admitted to receiving all orders and funding directly from the main United States office of Al-Kifah on Atlantic Avenue controlled by Shaykh Omar Abdel Rahman.38

One of the trainers at al-Kifah, Rodney Hampton-El, assisted in this support program, recruiting warriors from U.S. Army bases like Fort Belvoir, and also training them to be fighters in New Jersey.39 In 1995 Hampton-El was tried and convicted for his role (along with al-Kifah leader Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman) in the plot to blow up New York landmarks. At the trial Hampton-El testified how he was personally given thousands of dollars for this project by Saudi Crown Prince Faisal in the Washington Saudi Embassy.40

About this time, Ayman al-Zawahiri, today the leader of al Qaeda, came to America to raise funds in Silicon Valley, where he was hosted by Ali Mohamed, a U.S. double agent and veteran of U.S. Army Special Forces who had been the top trainer at the Al-Kifah mosque.41 Almost certainly al-Zawahiri’s fund-raising was in support of the mujahedin in Bosnia, reportedly his chief concern at the time. (“The Asian edition of the Wall Street Journal reported that, in 1993, Mr. bin Laden had appointed Sheik Ayman Al-Zawahiri, the al-Qaeda’s second-in-command, to direct his operations in the Balkans.”)42

Ayman al-Zawahiri

Wiebes’ detailed report and the news stories based on it corroborated earlier charges made in 1997 by Sir Alfred Sherman, top adviser to Margaret Thatcher and co-founder of the influential rightwing nationalist Centre for Policy Studies, that “The U.S. encouraged and facilitated the dispatch of arms to the Moslems via Iran and Eastern Europe — a fact which was denied in Washington at the time in face of overwhelming evidence.”43 This was part of his case that

The war in Bosnia was America’s war in every sense of the word. The US administration helped start it, kept it going, and prevented its early end. Indeed all the indications are that it intends to continue the war in the near future, as soon as its Moslem proteges are fully armed and trained.

Specifically, Sherman charged that in 1992 Acting Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger had instructed Warren Zimmerman, U.S. Ambassador in Belgrade, to persuade Bosnian President Izetbegovic to renege on his agreement to preserve Bosnian-Croatian-Serbian unity, and instead accept American aid for an independent Bosnian state.44

The U.S.-al-Qaeda Alliance in Kosovo

This raises the disturbing question: were some Americans willing to ignore the atrocities of the al-Kifah mujahideen in Bosnia in exchange for mujahideen assistance in NATO’s successive wars dismantling Yugoslavia, the last surviving socialist republic in Europe? One thing is clear: Sir Alfred Sherman’s prediction in 1997 that America “intends to continue the war in the near future” soon proved accurate, when in 1999 American support for al-Qaeda’s allies in Kosovo, the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), led to a controversial NATO bombing campaign.

As was widely reported at the time, the KLA was supported both by the networks of bin Laden and al-Zawahiri, and also by the traffic in Afghan heroin:

Some members of the Kosovo Liberation Army, which has financed its war effort through the sale of heroin, were trained in terrorist camps run by international fugitive Osama bin Laden — who is wanted in the 1998 bombing of two U.S. embassies in Africa that killed 224 persons, including 12 Americans.45

According to former DEA agent Michael Levine, the decision of Clinton to back the KLA dismayed his DEA contacts who knew it to be a major drug-trafficking organization.46 As Ralf Mutschke of Interpol testified to Congress,

……………………….

– See more at: http://japanfocus.org/-Peter_Dale-Scott/3578#sthash.cBqWwpqm.dpuf

Automatisiert ausgesuchte Artikel zum Thema:

  1. TOP SECRET AMERICA: “Eine versteckte Welt, jeder Kontrolle entwachsen”
    Über zwei Jahre lang haben die “Washington Post”-Reporter Dana Priest und William M. Arkin im Spionage-Komplex der USA recherchiert. Die…
  2. Ab Montag im Handel: “Mordanschlag 9/11“
    Was haben Pipelines in Zentralasien, die Problematik des Peak Oil, der US-Dollar, illegale Drogen und der militärisch-industrielle Komplex mit dem…
  3. 9/11: Wer auch immer dahintersteckt
    Im folgenden Interview beantwortet Paul Schreyer, der Autor des Buches “Inside 9/11“, unter anderem Fragen zu den Kriegsübungen am Morgen…
Kategorien:Europa, NATO - Gladio